Funnelsort

From testwiki
Revision as of 04:39, 31 July 2024 by imported>GreenC bot (Move 1 url. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#ieee.org)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Multiple issues

Funnelsort is a comparison-based sorting algorithm. It is similar to mergesort, but it is a cache-oblivious algorithm, designed for a setting where the number of elements to sort is too large to fit in a cache where operations are done. It was introduced by Matteo Frigo, Charles Leiserson, Harald Prokop, and Sridhar Ramachandran in 1999 in the context of the cache oblivious model.[1][2]

Mathematical properties

In the external memory model, the number of memory transfers it needs to perform a sort of N items on a machine with cache of size Z and cache lines of length L is O(NLlogZN), under the tall cache assumption that Z=Ω(L2). This number of memory transfers has been shown to be asymptotically optimal for comparison sorts. Funnelsort also achieves the asymptotically optimal runtime complexity of Θ(NlogN).

Algorithm

Basic overview

Funnelsort operates on a contiguous array of N elements. To sort the elements, it performs the following:

  1. Split the input into N1/3 arrays of size N2/3, and sort the arrays recursively.
  2. Merge the N1/3 sorted sequences using a N1/3-merger. (This process will be described in more detail.)

Funnelsort is similar to merge sort in that some number of subarrays are recursively sorted, after which a merging step combines the subarrays into one sorted array. Merging is performed by a device called a k-merger, which is described in the section below.

k-mergers

A k-merger takes k sorted sequences. Upon one invocation of a k-merger, it outputs the first k3 elements of the sorted sequence obtained by merging the k input sequences.

At the top level, funnelsort uses a N1/3-merger on N1/3 sequences of length N2/3, and invokes this merger once.

The k-merger is built recursively out of k-mergers. It consists of k input k-mergers I1,I2,,Ik, and a single output k-merger O. The k inputs are separated into k sets of k inputs each. Each of these sets is an input to one of the input mergers. The output of each input merger is connected to a buffer, a FIFO queue that can hold 2k3/2 elements. The buffers are implemented as circular queues. The outputs of the k buffers are connected to the inputs of the output merger O. Finally, the output of O is the output of the entire k-merger.

In this construction, any input merger only outputs k3/2 items at once, but the buffer it outputs to has double the space. This is done so that an input merger can be called only when its buffer does not have enough items, but that when it is called, it outputs a lot of items at once (namely, k3/2 of them).

A k-merger works recursively in the following way. To output k3 elements, it recursively invokes its output merger k3/2 times. However, before it makes a call to O, it checks all of its buffers, filling each of them that are less than half full. To fill the i-th buffer, it recursively invokes the corresponding input merger Ii once. If this cannot be done (due to the merger running out of inputs), this step is skipped. Since this call outputs k3/2 elements, the buffer contains at least k3/2 elements. At the end of all these operations, the k-merger has output the first k3 of its input elements, in sorted order.

Analysis

Most of the analysis of this algorithm revolves around analyzing the space and cache miss complexity of the k-merger.

The first important bound is that a k-merger can be fit in O(k2) space. To see this, we let S(k) denote the space needed for a k-merger. To fit the k1/2 buffers of size 2k3/2 takes O(k2) space. To fit the k+1 smaller buffers takes (k+1)S(k) space. Thus, the space satisfies the recurrence S(k)=(k+1)S(k)+O(k2). This recurrence has solution S(k)=O(k2).

It follows that there is a positive constant α such that a problem of size at most αZ fits entirely in cache, meaning that it incurs no additional cache misses.

Letting QM(k) denote the number of cache misses incurred by a call to a k-merger, one can show that QM(k)=O((k3logZk)/L). This is done by an induction argument. It has kαZ as a base case. For larger k, we can bound the number of times a k-merger is called. The output merger is called exactly k3/2 times. The total number of calls on input mergers is at most k3/2+2k. This gives a total bound of 2k3/2+2k recursive calls. In addition, the algorithm checks every buffer to see if needs to be filled. This is done on k buffers every step for k3/2 steps, leading to a max of k2 cache misses for all the checks.

This leads to the recurrence QM(k)(2k3/2+2k)QM(k)+k2, which can be shown to have the solution given above.

Finally, the total cache misses Q(N) for the entire sort can be analyzed. It satisfies the recurrence Q(N)=N1/3Q(N2/3)+QM(N1/3). This can be shown to have solution Q(N)=O((N/L)logZN).

Lazy funnelsort

Lazy funnelsort is a modification of the funnelsort, introduced by Gerth Stølting Brodal and Rolf Fagerberg in 2002.[3] The modification is that when a merger is invoked, it does not have to fill each of its buffers. Instead, it lazily fills a buffer only when it is empty. This modification has the same asymptotic runtime and memory transfers as the original funnelsort, but has applications in cache-oblivious algorithms for problems in computational geometry in a method known as distribution sweeping.

See also

References

Template:Reflist

  1. M. Frigo, C.E. Leiserson, H. Prokop, and S. Ramachandran. Cache-oblivious algorithms. In Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 99), pp. 285-297. 1999. Extended abstract at IEEE, at Citeseer.
  2. Harald Prokop. Cache-Oblivious Algorithms. Masters thesis, MIT. 1999.
  3. Template:Cite book. See also the longer technical report.