K-theory of a category

From testwiki
Revision as of 14:39, 1 March 2025 by imported>Headbomb (Undid revision 1260969681 by Ira Leviton (talk))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description

In algebraic K-theory, the K-theory of a category C (usually equipped with some kind of additional data) is a sequence of abelian groups Ki(C) associated to it. If C is an abelian category, there is no need for extra data, but in general it only makes sense to speak of K-theory after specifying on C a structure of an exact category, or of a Waldhausen category, or of a dg-category, or possibly some other variants. Thus, there are several constructions of those groups, corresponding to various kinds of structures put on C. Traditionally, the K-theory of C is defined to be the result of a suitable construction, but in some contexts there are more conceptual definitions. For instance, the K-theory is a 'universal additive invariant' of dg-categories[1] and small stable ∞-categories.[2]

The motivation for this notion comes from algebraic K-theory of rings. For a ring R Daniel Quillen in Template:Harvtxt introduced two equivalent ways to find the higher K-theory. The plus construction expresses Ki(R) in terms of R directly, but it's hard to prove properties of the result, including basic ones like functoriality. The other way is to consider the exact category of projective modules over R and to set Ki(R) to be the K-theory of that category, defined using the Q-construction. This approach proved to be more useful, and could be applied to other exact categories as well. Later Friedhelm Waldhausen in Template:Harvtxt extended the notion of K-theory even further, to very different kinds of categories, including the category of topological spaces.

K-theory of Waldhausen categories

In algebra, the S-construction is a construction in algebraic K-theory that produces a model that can be used to define higher K-groups. It is due to Friedhelm Waldhausen and concerns a category with cofibrations and weak equivalences; such a category is called a Waldhausen category and generalizes Quillen's exact category. A cofibration can be thought of as analogous to a monomorphism, and a category with cofibrations is one in which, roughly speaking, monomorphisms are stable under pushouts.[3] According to Waldhausen, the "S" was chosen to stand for Graeme B. Segal.[4]

Unlike the Q-construction, which produces a topological space, the S-construction produces a simplicial set.

Details

The arrow category Ar(C) of a category C is a category whose objects are morphisms in C and whose morphisms are squares in C. Let a finite ordered set [n]={0<1<2<<n} be viewed as a category in the usual way.

Let C be a category with cofibrations and let SnC be a category whose objects are functors f:Ar[n]C such that, for ijk, f(i=i)=*, f(ij)f(ik) is a cofibration, and f(jk) is the pushout of f(ij)f(ik) and f(ij)f(j=j)=*. The category SnC defined in this manner is itself a category with cofibrations. One can therefore iterate the construction, forming the sequenceS(m)C=SSC. This sequence is a spectrum called the K-theory spectrum of C.

The additivity theorem

Most basic properties of algebraic K-theory of categories are consequences of the following important theorem.[5] There are versions of it in all available settings. Here's a statement for Waldhausen categories. Notably, it's used to show that the sequence of spaces obtained by the iterated S-construction is an Ω-spectrum.

Let C be a Waldhausen category. The category of extensions (C) has as objects the sequences ABA in C, where the first map is a cofibration, and BA is a quotient map, i.e. a pushout of the first one along the zero map A0. This category has a natural Waldhausen structure, and the forgetful functor [ABA](A,A) from (C) to C × C respects it. The additivity theorem says that the induced map on K-theory spaces K((C))K(C)×K(C) is a homotopy equivalence.[6]

For dg-categories the statement is similar. Let C be a small pretriangulated dg-category with a semiorthogonal decomposition CC1,C2. Then the map of K-theory spectra K(C) → K(C1) ⊕ K(C2) is a homotopy equivalence.[7] In fact, K-theory is a universal functor satisfying this additivity property and Morita invariance.[1]

Category of finite sets

Consider the category of pointed finite sets. This category has an object k+={0,1,,k} for every natural number k, and the morphisms in this category are the functions f:m+n+ which preserve the zero element. A theorem of Barratt, Priddy and Quillen says that the algebraic K-theory of this category is a sphere spectrum.[4]

Miscellaneous

More generally in abstract category theory, the K-theory of a category is a type of decategorification in which a set is created from an equivalence class of objects in a stable (∞,1)-category, where the elements of the set inherit an Abelian group structure from the exact sequences in the category.[8]

Group completion method

The Grothendieck group construction is a functor from the category of rings to the category of abelian groups. The higher K-theory should then be a functor from the category of rings but to the category of higher objects such as simplicial abelian groups.

Topological Hochschild homology

Waldhausen introduced the idea of a trace map from the algebraic K-theory of a ring to its Hochschild homology; by way of this map, information can be obtained about the K-theory from the Hochschild homology. Bökstedt factorized this trace map, leading to the idea of a functor known as the topological Hochschild homology of the ring's Eilenberg–MacLane spectrum.[9]

K-theory of a simplicial ring

If R is a constant simplicial ring, then this is the same thing as K-theory of a ring.


See also

Notes

Template:Reflist

References

Further reading

For the recent ∞-category approach, see