Hodges' estimator
Template:Short description In statistics, Hodges' estimator[1] (or the Hodges–Le Cam estimator[2]), named for Joseph Hodges, is a famous counterexample of an estimator which is "superefficient",[3] i.e. it attains smaller asymptotic variance than regular efficient estimators. The existence of such a counterexample is the reason for the introduction of the notion of regular estimators.
Hodges' estimator improves upon a regular estimator at a single point. In general, any superefficient estimator may surpass a regular estimator at most on a set of Lebesgue measure zero.[4]
Although Hodges discovered the estimator he never published it; the first publication was in the doctoral thesis of Lucien Le Cam.[5]
Construction
Suppose is a "common" estimator for some parameter : it is consistent, and converges to some asymptotic distribution (usually this is a normal distribution with mean zero and variance which may depend on ) at the -rate:
Then the Hodges' estimator is defined as[6]
This estimator is equal to everywhere except on the small interval , where it is equal to zero. It is not difficult to see that this estimator is consistent for , and its asymptotic distribution is[7]
for any . Thus this estimator has the same asymptotic distribution as for all , whereas for the rate of convergence becomes arbitrarily fast. This estimator is superefficient, as it surpasses the asymptotic behavior of the efficient estimator at least at one point .
It is not true that the Hodges estimator is equivalent to the sample mean, but much better when the true mean is 0. The correct interpretation is that, for finite , the truncation can lead to worse square error than the sample mean estimator for close to 0, as is shown in the example in the following section.[8]
Le Cam shows that this behaviour is typical: superefficiency at the point θ implies the existence of a sequence such that is strictly larger than the Cramér-Rao bound. For the extreme case where the asymptotic risk at θ is zero, the is even infinite for a sequence .[9]
In general, superefficiency may only be attained on a subset of Lebesgue measure zero of the parameter space .[10]
Example

Suppose x1, ..., xn is an independent and identically distributed (IID) random sample from normal distribution Template:Nowrap with unknown mean but known variance. Then the common estimator for the population mean θ is the arithmetic mean of all observations: . The corresponding Hodges' estimator will be , where 1{...} denotes the indicator function.
The mean square error (scaled by n) associated with the regular estimator x is constant and equal to 1 for all θTemplate:'s. At the same time the mean square error of the Hodges' estimator behaves erratically in the vicinity of zero, and even becomes unbounded as Template:Nowrap. This demonstrates that the Hodges' estimator is not regular, and its asymptotic properties are not adequately described by limits of the form (θ fixed, Template:Nowrap).
See also
Notes
References
- ↑ Template:Harvtxt
- ↑ Template:Harvtxt
- ↑ Template:Harvtxt
- ↑ Template:Harvtxt
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Harvtxt
- ↑ Template:Harvtxt
- ↑ Vaart AW van der. Asymptotic Statistics. Cambridge University Press; 1998.
- ↑ van der Vaart, A. W., & Wellner, J. A. (1996). Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes. In Springer Series in Statistics. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2545-2
- ↑ Vaart AW van der. Asymptotic Statistics. Cambridge University Press; 1998.
- ↑ Template:Harvtxt