Three subgroups lemma

From testwiki
Revision as of 18:03, 22 July 2022 by imported>Theoh (Add link for "eponymous identity" Commutator#Identities (group theory))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, more specifically group theory, the three subgroups lemma is a result concerning commutators. It is a consequence of Philip Hall and Ernst Witt's eponymous identity.

Notation

In what follows, the following notation will be employed:

  • If H and K are subgroups of a group G, the commutator of H and K, denoted by [H, K], is defined as the subgroup of G generated by commutators between elements in the two subgroups. If L is a third subgroup, the convention that [H,K,L] = [[H,K],L] will be followed.
  • If x and y are elements of a group G, the conjugate of x by y will be denoted by xy.
  • If H is a subgroup of a group G, then the centralizer of H in G will be denoted by CG(H).

Statement

Let X, Y and Z be subgroups of a group G, and assume

[X,Y,Z]=1 and [Y,Z,X]=1.

Then [Z,X,Y]=1.[1]

More generally, for a normal subgroup N of G, if [X,Y,Z]N and [Y,Z,X]N, then [Z,X,Y]N.[2]

Proof and the Hall–Witt identity

Hall–Witt identity

If x,y,zG, then

[x,y1,z]y[y,z1,x]z[z,x1,y]x=1.

Proof of the three subgroups lemma

Let xX, yY, and zZ. Then [x,y1,z]=1=[y,z1,x], and by the Hall–Witt identity above, it follows that [z,x1,y]x=1 and so [z,x1,y]=1. Therefore, [z,x1]𝐂G(Y) for all zZ and xX. Since these elements generate [Z,X], we conclude that [Z,X]𝐂G(Y) and hence [Z,X,Y]=1.

See also

Notes

Template:Reflist

References

  1. Isaacs, Lemma 8.27, p. 111
  2. Isaacs, Corollary 8.28, p. 111