Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2009 March 19

From testwiki
Revision as of 15:36, 25 February 2022 by imported>MalnadachBot (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < March 18 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Feb | March | Apr >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


March 19

Functional Convergence

In a recent thread, if I understand correctly, pma says that 1knlogcos(k2n5s) converges pointwise to s2/10 as n approaces infinity. How would you prove that? Black Carrot (talk) 07:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Won't the limit depend on what branch of log you choose for negative arguments? Algebraist 10:23, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
My apologies: I made a misprint there (now corrected): the change of variables was t=n5/2s, with a minus in the exponent (this is consistent with the line below, that had it). So the term n5 is at the denominator, and the argument of log goes to 1 (actually, in that computation it was always positive). Do you see how to do it now?--pma (talk) 12:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Here it is:
  • Write the second order Taylor expansion for logcos(x) at 0, with remainder in Peano form: so, for all x[0,π/2)
logcos(x)=x22+o(x2), as x0.
  • For any s we only have to consider the integers n>4s2/π2. Replace x=k2n5s=sn(kn)2 in the expansion above, getting
logcos(k2n5s)=s22n(kn)4+o(1n), as n, and uniformly for all 1kn.
  • Summing over all 1kn
1knlogcos(k2n5s)=s22n1kn(kn)4+o(1), as n.
  • Then you may observe that 1n1kn(kn)4 is the Riemann sum for the integral of x4 on [0,1] (or use the formula for 1knk4) and conclude that the whole thing is s210+o(1).
Warning: I have re-edited this answer, to make it more simple and clear (hopefully) --pma (talk) 13:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Differential Equation

How should one go about solving this equation.

ydydx=xyd2ydx2+x(dydx)2

92.9.236.44 (talk) 20:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

The right hand side is xddx(ydydx). Does that help? —JAOTC 20:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Ah yes. It seems to yeild a solution of the form y=Ax2+B does that seem correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.9.236.44 (talk) 21:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Check for yourself - differentiate that a couple of times, substitute everything in and see if the two sides match. If they do, you've got it right, if they don't, you haven't! --Tango (talk) 23:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)