Massera's lemma

From testwiki
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In stability theory and nonlinear control, Massera's lemma, named after José Luis Massera, deals with the construction of the Lyapunov function to prove the stability of a dynamical system.[1] The lemma appears in Template:Harv as the first lemma in section 12, and in more general form in Template:Harv as lemma 2. In 2004, Massera's original lemma for single variable functions was extended to the multivariable case, and the resulting lemma was used to prove the stability of switched dynamical systems, where a common Lyapunov function describes the stability of multiple modes and switching signals.

Massera's original lemma

Massera’s lemma is used in the construction of a converse Lyapunov function of the following form (also known as the integral construction)

V(ζ)=0G(|φ(t,ζ)|)dt

for an asymptotically stable dynamical system whose stable trajectory starting from ζ is φ(t,ζ).

The lemma states:

Let g:[0,)R be a positive, continuous, strictly decreasing function with g(t)0 as t. Let h:[0,)R be a positive, continuous, nondecreasing function. Then there exists a function G:[0,)[0,) such that

  • G and its derivative G are class-K functions defined for all t ≥ 0
  • There exist positive constants k1, k2, such that for any continuous function u satisfying 0 ≤ u(t) ≤ g(t) for all t ≥ 0,
0G(u(t))dtk1;0G(u(t))h(t)dtk2.

Extension to multivariable functions

Massera's lemma for single variable functions was extended to the multivariable case by Vu and Liberzon.[2]

Let g:[0,)R be a positive, continuous, strictly decreasing function with g(t)0 as t. Let h:[0,)R be a positive, continuous, nondecreasing function. Then there exists a differentiable function G:[0,)[0,) such that

  • G and its derivative G are class-K functions on [0,).
  • For every positive integer , there exist positive constants k1, k2, such that for any continuous function u:[0,) satisfying
0u(t1,,t)g(t1++t) for all ti0, i=1,,
we have
00G(u(s1,,s))ds1ds<k1
00G(u(s1,,s))×h(s1++s)ds1ds<k2

References

Footnotes

Template:Reflist