Testwiki:Articles for deletion/Frankie Falcone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge, NOT performed by the closing admin. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 03:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Frankie Falcone

Template:La – (View log)

Minor character in The Godfather novel, and no role at all in the film. Not notable enough for a separate article. Blueboy96 17:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep Without getting into deep literary criticism I would say he is an important character in a major novel. (What's "No role in the film" got to do with it?). Is sub planning to dismantle the comprehensive coverage of the Godfather in WP? Which character will be next? Annamonckton (talk) 17:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• Merge or delete if no merge target can be found. No context, does not meet notability guidelines by far. – sgeureka ^t•c 19:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete No need for literary criticism. The question is are there multiple independent WP:RS about this guy? A sentence on the books page is fine.Obina (talk) 21:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect, I think that the character is notable enough to be merged into the parent article. Deleting is a bit much.--Sallicio^$\oplus$ 09:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete and Comment I also think a lot of the articles located in this template should be deleted too. D.M.N. (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 03:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

• Merge into a suitable article for the minor characters; construct one if necessary. It does appear that nothing specific has really been said about him as yet. DGG (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect; concur that the whole template deserves a closer look. JJL (talk) 04:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.