De Bruijn–Newman constant

From testwiki
Revision as of 23:43, 4 February 2025 by imported>CRau080 (Upper bounds: adding authorlink field to one ref.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:DistinguishTemplate:For Template:Lowercase title The de Bruijn–Newman constant, denoted by Λ and named after Nicolaas Govert de Bruijn and Charles Michael Newman, is a mathematical constant defined via the zeros of a certain function H(λ,z), where λ is a real parameter and z is a complex variable. More precisely,

H(λ,z):=0eλu2Φ(u)cos(zu)du,

where Φ is the super-exponentially decaying function

Φ(u)=n=1(2π2n4e9u3πn2e5u)eπn2e4u

and Λ is the unique real number with the property that H has only real zeros if and only if λΛ.

The constant is closely connected with Riemann hypothesis. Indeed, the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the conjecture that Λ0.[1] Brad Rodgers and Terence Tao proved that Λ0, so the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to Λ=0.[2] A simplified proof of the Rodgers–Tao result was later given by Alexander Dobner.[3]

History

De Bruijn showed in 1950 that H has only real zeros if λ1/2, and moreover, that if H has only real zeros for some λ, H also has only real zeros if λ is replaced by any larger value.[4] Newman proved in 1976 the existence of a constant Λ for which the "if and only if" claim holds; and this then implies that Λ is unique. Newman also conjectured that Λ0,[5] which was proven forty years later, by Brad Rodgers and Terence Tao in 2018.

Upper bounds

De Bruijn's upper bound of Λ1/2 was not improved until 2008, when Ki, Kim and Lee proved Λ<1/2, making the inequality strict.[6]

In December 2018, the 15th Polymath project improved the bound to Λ0.22.[7][8][9] A manuscript of the Polymath work was submitted to arXiv in late April 2019,[10] and was published in the journal Research In the Mathematical Sciences in August 2019.[11]

This bound was further slightly improved in April 2020 by Platt and Trudgian to Λ0.2.[12]

Historical bounds

Historical lower bounds
Year Lower bound on Λ Authors
1987 −50[13] Csordas, G.; Norfolk, T. S.; Varga, R. S. 
1990 −5[14] te Riele, H. J. J.
1991 −0.0991[15] Csordas, G.; Ruttan, A.; Varga, R. S. 
1993 −5.895Template:E[16] Csordas, G.; Odlyzko, A.M.; Smith, W.; Varga, R.S.
2000 −2.7Template:E[17] Odlyzko, A.M.
2011 −1.1Template:E[18] Saouter, Yannick; Gourdon, Xavier; Demichel, Patrick
2018 ≥0[2] Rodgers, Brad; Tao, Terence
Historical upper bounds
Year Upper bound on Λ Authors
1950 ≤ 1/2[4] de Bruijn, N.G.
2008 < 1/2[6] Ki, H.; Kim, Y-O.; Lee, J.
2019 ≤ 0.22[7] Polymath, D.H.J.
2020 ≤ 0.2[12] Platt, D.; Trudgian, T.

References

Template:Reflist