Total ring of fractions

Template:Sidebar with collapsible lists In abstract algebra, the total quotient ringTemplate:Sfn or total ring of fractionsTemplate:Sfn is a construction that generalizes the notion of the field of fractions of an integral domain to commutative rings R that may have zero divisors. The construction embeds R in a larger ring, giving every non-zero-divisor of R an inverse in the larger ring. If the homomorphism from R to the new ring is to be injective, no further elements can be given an inverse.

Definition

Let $R$ be a commutative ring and let $S$ be the set of elements that are not zero divisors in $R$; then $S$ is a multiplicatively closed set. Hence we may localize the ring $R$ at the set $S$ to obtain the total quotient ring $S^{-1}R=Q(R)$.

If $R$ is a domain, then $S=R-\{0\}$ and the total quotient ring is the same as the field of fractions. This justifies the notation $Q(R)$, which is sometimes used for the field of fractions as well, since there is no ambiguity in the case of a domain.

Since $S$ in the construction contains no zero divisors, the natural map $R\to Q(R)$ is injective, so the total quotient ring is an extension of $R$.

Examples

• For a product ring Template:Nowrap, the total quotient ring Template:Nowrap is the product of total quotient rings Template:Nowrap. In particular, if A and B are integral domains, it is the product of quotient fields.

• For the ring of holomorphic functions on an open set D of complex numbers, the total quotient ring is the ring of meromorphic functions on D, even if D is not connected.

• In an Artinian ring, all elements are units or zero divisors. Hence the set of non-zero-divisors is the group of units of the ring, $R^{\times }$, and so $Q(R)=(R^{\times }{)}^{-1}R$. But since all these elements already have inverses, $Q(R)=R$.

• In a commutative von Neumann regular ring R, the same thing happens. Suppose a in R is not a zero divisor. Then in a von Neumann regular ring a = axa for some x in R, giving the equation a(xa − 1) = 0. Since a is not a zero divisor, xa = 1, showing a is a unit. Here again, $Q(R)=R$.

• In algebraic geometry one considers a sheaf of total quotient rings on a scheme, and this may be used to give the definition of a Cartier divisor.

The total ring of fractions of a reduced ring

Proof: Every element of Q(A) is either a unit or a zero divisor. Thus, any proper ideal I of Q(A) is contained in the set of zero divisors of Q(A); that set equals the union of the minimal prime ideals ${𝔭}_{i}Q(A)$ since Q(A) is reduced. By prime avoidance, I must be contained in some ${𝔭}_{i}Q(A)$. Hence, the ideals ${𝔭}_{i}Q(A)$ are maximal ideals of Q(A). Also, their intersection is zero. Thus, by the Chinese remainder theorem applied to Q(A),

$Q(A)\simeq \prod _{i}Q(A)/{𝔭}_{i}Q(A)$.

Let S be the multiplicatively closed set of non-zero-divisors of A. By exactness of localization,

$Q(A)/{𝔭}_{i}Q(A)=A[S^{-1}]/{𝔭}_{i}A[S^{-1}]=(A/{𝔭}_i)[S^{-1}]$,

which is already a field and so must be $Q(A/{𝔭}_i)$. $◻$

Generalization

If $R$ is a commutative ring and $S$ is any multiplicatively closed set in $R$, the localization $S^{-1}R$ can still be constructed, but the ring homomorphism from $R$ to $S^{-1}R$ might fail to be injective. For example, if $0\in S$, then $S^{-1}R$ is the trivial ring.

References

• Template:Citation
• Template:Citation