Tube lemma

From testwiki
Revision as of 02:46, 17 February 2025 by imported>AndyrooP (Adding local short description: "Lemma in topology", overriding Wikidata description "proof in topology")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description In mathematics, particularly topology, the tube lemma, also called Wallace's theorem, is a useful tool in order to prove that the finite product of compact spaces is compact.

Statement

The lemma uses the following terminology:

  • If X and Y are topological spaces and X×Y is the product space, endowed with the product topology, a slice in X×Y is a set of the form {x}×Y for xX.
  • A tube in X×Y is a subset of the form U×Y where U is an open subset of X. It contains all the slices {x}×Y for xU.

Template:Math theorem

Using the concept of closed maps, this can be rephrased concisely as follows: if X is any topological space and Y a compact space, then the projection map X×YX is closed.

Template:Math theorem

Template:Math theorem

Examples and properties

1. Consider × in the product topology, that is the Euclidean plane, and the open set N={(x,y)×:|xy|<1}. The open set N contains {0}×, but contains no tube, so in this case the tube lemma fails. Indeed, if W× is a tube containing {0}× and contained in N, W must be a subset of (1/x,1/x) for all x>0 which means W={0} contradicting the fact that W is open in (because W× is a tube). This shows that the compactness assumption is essential.

2. The tube lemma can be used to prove that if X and Y are compact spaces, then X×Y is compact as follows:

Let {Ga} be an open cover of X×Y. For each xX, cover the slice {x}×Y by finitely many elements of {Ga} (this is possible since {x}×Y is compact, being homeomorphic to Y). Call the union of these finitely many elements Nx. By the tube lemma, there is an open set of the form Wx×Y containing {x}×Y and contained in Nx. The collection of all Wx for xX is an open cover of X and hence has a finite subcover {Wx1,,Wxn}. Thus the finite collection {Wx1×Y,,Wxn×Y} covers X×Y. Using the fact that each Wxi×Y is contained in Nxi and each Nxi is the finite union of elements of {Ga}, one gets a finite subcollection of {Ga} that covers X×Y.

3. By part 2 and induction, one can show that the finite product of compact spaces is compact.

4. The tube lemma cannot be used to prove the Tychonoff theorem, which generalizes the above to infinite products.

Proof

The tube lemma follows from the generalized tube lemma by taking A={x} and B=Y. It therefore suffices to prove the generalized tube lemma. By the definition of the product topology, for each (a,b)A×B there are open sets Ua,bX and Va,bY such that (a,b)Ua,b×Va,bN. For any aA, {Va,b:bB} is an open cover of the compact set B so this cover has a finite subcover; namely, there is a finite set B0(a)B such that Va:=bB0(a)Va,b contains B, where observe that Va is open in Y. For every aA, let Ua:=bB0(a)Ua,b, which is an open in X set since B0(a) is finite. Moreover, the construction of Ua and Va implies that {a}×BUa×VaN. We now essentially repeat the argument to drop the dependence on a. Let A0A be a finite subset such that U:=aA0Ua contains A and set V:=aA0Va. It then follows by the above reasoning that A×BU×VN and UX and VY are open, which completes the proof.

See also

References

Template:Reflist