Congruent number

In number theory, a congruent number is a positive integer that is the area of a right triangle with three rational number sides.[1][2] A more general definition includes all positive rational numbers with this property.[3]
The sequence of (integer) congruent numbers starts with
- 5, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, 30, 31, 34, 37, 38, 39, 41, 45, 46, 47, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 69, 70, 71, 77, 78, 79, 80, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 101, 102, 103, 109, 110, 111, 112, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, ... Template:OEIS
| Template:Mvar | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | C | C | C | — | |
| Template:Mvar | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| — | — | — | — | C | C | C | — | |
| Template:Mvar | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| — | — | — | S | C | C | C | S | |
| Template:Mvar | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 |
| — | — | — | S | C | C | C | — | |
| Template:Mvar | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 |
| — | C | — | — | C | C | C | — | |
| Template:Mvar | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 |
| C | — | — | — | S | C | C | — | |
| Template:Mvar | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 |
| — | — | — | S | C | S | C | S | |
| Template:Mvar | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 |
| — | — | — | S | C | C | S | — | |
| Template:Mvar | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 |
| C | — | — | — | C | C | C | — | |
| Template:Mvar | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 |
| — | — | — | — | C | C | C | S | |
| Template:Mvar | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 |
| — | — | — | S | C | C | C | S | |
| Template:Mvar | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 |
| — | — | — | S | C | C | C | S | |
| Template:Mvar | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 |
| — | — | — | — | C | C | C | — | |
| Template:Mvar | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 |
| — | — | — | — | C | C | C | S | |
| Template:Mvar | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 |
| — | — | — | S | S | C | C | S |
For example, 5 is a congruent number because it is the area of a (20/3, 3/2, 41/6) triangle. Similarly, 6 is a congruent number because it is the area of a (3,4,5) triangle. 3 and 4 are not congruent numbers.
If Template:Mvar is a congruent number then Template:Math is also a congruent number for any natural number Template:Mvar (just by multiplying each side of the triangle by Template:Mvar), and vice versa. This leads to the observation that whether a nonzero rational number Template:Mvar is a congruent number depends only on its residue in the group
where is the set of nonzero rational numbers.
Every residue class in this group contains exactly one square-free integer, and it is common, therefore, only to consider square-free positive integers, when speaking about congruent numbers.
Congruent number problem
The question of determining whether a given rational number is a congruent number is called the congruent number problem. Template:As of, this problem has not been brought to a successful resolution. Tunnell's theorem provides an easily testable criterion for determining whether a number is congruent; but his result relies on the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture, which is still unproven.
Fermat's right triangle theorem, named after Pierre de Fermat, states that no square number can be a congruent number. However, in the form that every congruum (the difference between consecutive elements in an arithmetic progression of three squares) is non-square, it was already known (without proof) to Fibonacci.[4] Every congruum is a congruent number, and every congruent number is a product of a congruum and the square of a rational number.[5] However, determining whether a number is a congruum is much easier than determining whether it is congruent, because there is a parameterized formula for congrua for which only finitely many parameter values need to be tested.[6]
Solutions
n is a congruent number if and only if the system
- ,
has a solution where , and are integers.[7]
Given a solution, the three numbers , , and will be in an arithmetic progression with common difference .
Furthermore, if there is one solution (where the right-hand sides are squares), then there are infinitely many: given any solution , another solution can be computed from[8]
For example, with , the equations are:
One solution is (so that ). Another solution is
With this new and , the new right-hand sides are still both squares:
Using as above gives
Given , and , one can obtain , and such that
- , and
from
Then and are the legs and hypotenuse of a right triangle with area .
The above values produce . The values give . Both of these right triangles have area .
Relation to elliptic curves
The question of whether a given number is congruent turns out to be equivalent to the condition that a certain elliptic curve has positive rank.[3] An alternative approach to the idea is presented below (as can essentially also be found in the introduction to Tunnell's paper).
Suppose Template:Mvar, Template:Mvar, Template:Mvar are numbers (not necessarily positive or rational) which satisfy the following two equations:
Then set Template:Math and Template:Math. A calculation shows
and Template:Mvar is not 0 (if Template:Math then Template:Math, so Template:Math, but Template:Math is nonzero, a contradiction).
Conversely, if Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar are numbers which satisfy the above equation and Template:Mvar is not 0, set Template:Math, Template:Math, and Template:Math. A calculation shows these three numbers satisfy the two equations for Template:Mvar, Template:Mvar, and Template:Mvar above.
These two correspondences between (Template:Mvar,Template:Mvar,Template:Mvar) and (Template:Mvar,Template:Mvar) are inverses of each other, so we have a one-to-one correspondence between any solution of the two equations in Template:Mvar, Template:Mvar, and Template:Mvar and any solution of the equation in Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar with Template:Mvar nonzero. In particular, from the formulas in the two correspondences, for rational Template:Mvar we see that Template:Mvar, Template:Mvar, and Template:Mvar are rational if and only if the corresponding Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar are rational, and vice versa. (We also have that Template:Mvar, Template:Mvar, and Template:Mvar are all positive if and only if Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar are all positive; from the equation Template:Math we see that if Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar are positive then Template:Math must be positive, so the formula for Template:Mvar above is positive.)
Thus a positive rational number Template:Mvar is congruent if and only if the equation Template:Math has a rational point with Template:Mvar not equal to 0. It can be shown (as an application of Dirichlet's theorem on primes in arithmetic progression) that the only torsion points on this elliptic curve are those with Template:Mvar equal to 0, hence the existence of a rational point with Template:Mvar nonzero is equivalent to saying the elliptic curve has positive rank.
Another approach to solving is to start with integer value of n denoted as N and solve
where
Current progress
For example, it is known that for a prime number Template:Mvar, the following holds:[9]
- if Template:Math, then Template:Mvar is not a congruent number, but 2Template:Mvar is a congruent number.
- if Template:Math, then Template:Mvar is a congruent number.
- if Template:Math, then Template:Mvar and 2Template:Mvar are congruent numbers.
It is also known that in each of the congruence classes Template:Math, for any given Template:Mvar there are infinitely many square-free congruent numbers with Template:Mvar prime factors.[10]
Notes
References
- Template:Citation
- Template:Citation
- Template:Citation – see, for a history of the problem.
- Template:Citation – Many references are given in it.
- Template:Citation
External links
- Template:MathWorld
- A short discussion of the current state of the problem with many references can be found in Alice Silverberg's Open Questions in Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry (Postscript).
- A Trillion Triangles - mathematicians have resolved the first one trillion cases (conditional on the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture).