Iron law of processor performance: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>GreenC bot
Reformat 1 archive link. Wayback Medic 2.5
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 02:26, 2 June 2024

In computer architecture, the iron law of processor performance (or simply iron law of performance) describes the performance trade-off between complexity and the number of primitive instructions that processors use to perform calculations.[1] This formulation of the trade-off spurred the developmentTemplate:Citation needed of Reduced Instruction Set Computers (RISC) whose instruction set architectures (ISAs) leverage a smaller set of core instructions to improve performance. The term was coined by Douglas Clark[2] based on research performed by Clark and Joel Emer in the 1980s.[3]

Explanation

The performance of a processor is the time it takes to execute a program: TimeProgram. This can be further broken down into three factors:[4]

InstructionsProgram×ClockCyclesInstruction×TimeClockCyclesSelection of an instruction set architecture affects InstructionsProgram×ClockCyclesInstruction, whereas TimeClockCycles is largely determined by the manufacturing technology. Classic Complex Instruction Set Computer (CISC) ISAs optimized InstructionsProgram by providing a larger set of more complex CPU instructions. Generally speaking, however, complex instructions inflate the number of clock cycles per instruction ClockCyclesInstruction because they must be decoded into simpler micro-operations actually performed by the hardware. After converting X86 binary to the micro-operations used internally, the total number of operations is close to what is produced for a comparable RISC ISA.[5] The iron law of processor performance makes this trade-off explicit and pushes for optimization of TimeProgramas a whole, not just a single component.

While the iron law is credited for sparking the development of RISC architectures,Template:Citation needed it does not imply that a simpler ISA is always faster. If that were the case, the fastest ISA would consist of simple binary logic. A single CISC instruction can be faster than the equivalent set of RISC instructions when it enables multiple micro-operations to be performed in a single clock cycle. In practice, however, the regularity of RISC instructions allowed a pipelined implementation where the total execution time of an instruction was (typically) ~5 clock cycles, but each instruction followed the previous instruction ~1 clock cycle later Template:Citation needed. CISC processors can also achieve higher performance using techniques such as modular extensions, predictive logic, compressed instructions, and macro-operation fusion.[6][5][7]

See also

References

Template:Reflist


Template:Compu-eng-stub