Testwiki:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2018 May 17: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Scsbot
edited by robot: archiving May 17
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 02:07, 25 May 2018

Template:Error:not substituted

{| width = "100%"

|- ! colspan="3" align="center" | Mathematics desk |- ! width="20%" align="left" | < May 16 ! width="25%" align="center"|<< Apr | May | Jun >> ! width="20%" align="right" |Current desk > |}

Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


May 17

Interpolating the roots of a polynomial from the roots of another

Given a root of the polynomial P is it possible to use that to find a root of polynomial Q if the two only differ by the last term? Like P=m^8-m^3+17 and Q=m^8-m^3-91. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.203.37.29 (talk) 13:55, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

It’s not possible in general. For example, Quintic function#Solvable quintics says x5xr=0 has solutions in radicals if and only if it has an integer solution or r is one of ±15, ±22440, or ±2759640, in which cases the polynomial is reducible. So if P has one of those specific values of r and Q does not and has no integer root, then we can’t use the root of P to find a root of Q, at least not in radicals. Loraof (talk) 18:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Does it make a difference if the roots are expressed in the form of approximations? Like x^5-x-53 as you say has no solution in radicals but it does have an complex root R at approximately (-1.78 - 1.28i). Could we not use R then to find a root of x^5-x+17? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.203.37.29 (talk) 21:04, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

The equation x5x53=0 has the 5 solutions: 2.23, 0.67 ± 2.12i and -1.78 ± 1.28i , while x5x+17=0 has solutions: -1.80, -0.52 ± 1.70i, and 1.41 ± 1.00i . Solving the first equation did not help solving the second one. Bo Jacoby (talk) 04:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC).

I think I understand now. The article on Wilkinson's polynomial was helpful too. Thanks guys. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.203.37.29 (talk) 09:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)