Local rigidity: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>1AmNobody24
m added link(s) to Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici (via WP:JWB)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 08:45, 15 October 2024

Template:Short description Local rigidity theorems in the theory of discrete subgroups of Lie groups are results which show that small deformations of certain such subgroups are always trivial. It is different from Mostow rigidity and weaker (but holds more frequently) than superrigidity.

History

The first such theorem was proven by Atle Selberg for co-compact discrete subgroups of the unimodular groups SLn().[1] Shortly afterwards a similar statement was proven by Eugenio Calabi in the setting of fundamental groups of compact hyperbolic manifolds. Finally, the theorem was extended to all co-compact subgroups of semisimple Lie groups by André Weil.[2][3] The extension to non-cocompact lattices was made later by Howard Garland and Madabusi Santanam Raghunathan.[4] The result is now sometimes referred to as Calabi—Weil (or just Weil) rigidity.

Statement

Deformations of subgroups

Let Γ be a group generated by a finite number of elements g1,,gn and G a Lie group. Then the map Hom(Γ,G)Gn defined by ρ(ρ(g1),,ρ(gn)) is injective and this endows Hom(Γ,G) with a topology induced by that of Gn. If Γ is a subgroup of G then a deformation of Γ is any element in Hom(Γ,G). Two representations ϕ,ψ are said to be conjugated if there exists a gG such that ϕ(γ)=gψ(γ)g1 for all γΓ. See also character variety.

Lattices in simple groups not of type A1 or A1 × A1

The simplest statement is when Γ is a lattice in a simple Lie group G and the latter is not locally isomorphic to SL2() or SL2() and Γ (this means that its Lie algebra is not that of one of these two groups).

There exists a neighbourhood U in Hom(Γ,G) of the inclusion i:ΓG such that any ϕU is conjugated to i.

Whenever such a statement holds for a pair GΓ we will say that local rigidity holds.

Lattices in SL(2,C)

Local rigidity holds for cocompact lattices in SL2(). A lattice Γ in SL2() which is not cocompact has nontrivial deformations coming from Thurston's hyperbolic Dehn surgery theory. However, if one adds the restriction that a representation must send parabolic elements in Γ to parabolic elements then local rigidity holds.

Lattices in SL(2,R)

In this case local rigidity never holds. For cocompact lattices a small deformation remains a cocompact lattice but it may not be conjugated to the original one (see Teichmüller space for more detail). Non-cocompact lattices are virtually free and hence have non-lattice deformations.

Semisimple Lie groups

Local rigidity holds for lattices in semisimple Lie groups providing the latter have no factor of type A1 (i.e. locally isomorphic to SL2() or SL2()) or the former is irreducible.

Other results

There are also local rigidity results where the ambient group is changed, even in case where superrigidity fails. For example, if Γ is a lattice in the unitary group SU(n,1) and n2 then the inclusion ΓSU(n,1)SU(n+1,1) is locally rigid.[5]

A uniform lattice Γ in any compactly generated topological group G is topologically locally rigid, in the sense that any sufficiently small deformation φ of the inclusion i:ΓG is injective and φ(Γ) is a uniform lattice in G. An irreducible uniform lattice in the isometry group of any proper geodesically complete CAT(0)-space not isometric to the hyperbolic plane and without Euclidean factors is locally rigid.[6]

Proofs of the theorem

Weil's original proof is by relating deformations of a subgroup Γ in G to the first cohomology group of Γ with coefficients in the Lie algebra of G, and then showing that this cohomology vanishes for cocompact lattices when G has no simple factor of absolute type A1. A more geometric proof which also work in the non-compact cases uses Charles Ehresmann (and William Thurston's) theory of (G,X) structures.[7]

References

Template:Reflist