Consensus estimate: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Monkbot
m Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 3 templates: hyphenate params (2×);
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 16:21, 13 January 2021

Consensus estimate is a technique for designing truthful mechanisms in a prior-free mechanism design setting. The technique was introduced for digital goods auctions[1] and later extended to more general settings.[2]

Suppose there is a digital good that we want to sell to a group of buyers with unknown valuations. We want to determine the price that will bring us maximum profit. Suppose we have a function that, given the valuations of the buyers, tells us the maximum profit that we can make. We can use it in the following way:

  1. Ask the buyers to tell their valuations.
  2. Calculate Rmax - the maximum profit possible given the valuations.
  3. Calculate a price that guarantees that we get a profit of Rmax.

Step 3 can be attained by a profit extraction mechanism, which is a truthful mechanism. However, in general the mechanism is not truthful, since the buyers can try to influence Rmax by bidding strategically. To solve this problem, we can replace the exact Rmax with an approximation - Rapp - that, with high probability, cannot be influenced by a single agent.[3]Template:Rp

As an example, suppose that we know that the valuation of each single agent is at most 0.1. As a first attempt of a consensus-estimate, let Rapp=Rmax = the value of Rmax rounded to the nearest integer below it. Intuitively, in "most cases", a single agent cannot influence the value of Rapp (e.g., if with true reports Rmax=56.7, then a single agent can only change it to between Rmax=56.6 and Rmax=56.8, but in all cases Rapp=56).

To make the notion of "most cases" more accurate, define: Rapp=Rmax+U, where U is a random variable drawn uniformly from [0,1]. This makes Rapp a random variable too. With probability at least 90%, Rapp cannot be influenced by any single agent, so a mechanism that uses Rapp is truthful with high probability.

Such random variable Rapp is called a consensus estimate:

  • "Consensus" means that, with high probability, a single agent cannot influence the outcome, so that there is an agreement between the outcomes with or without the agent.
  • "Estimate" means that the random variable is near the real variable that we are interested in - the variable Rmax.

The disadvantages of using a consensus estimate are:

  • It does not give us the optimal profit - but it gives us an approximately-optimal profit.
  • It is not entirely truthful - it is only "truthful with high probability" (the probability that an agent can gain from deviating goes to 0 when the number of winning agents grows).[3]Template:Rp

In practice, instead of rounding down to the nearest integer, it is better to use exponential rounding - rounding down to the nearest power of some constant.[3]Template:Rp In the case of digital goods, using this consensus-estimate allows us to attain at least 1/3.39 of the optimal profit, even in worst-case scenarios.

See also

References

Template:Reflist