Niven's theorem: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Citation bot
Added doi. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Dominic3203 | Category:Rational numbers | #UCB_Category 6/12
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 07:20, 12 January 2025

Template:Short description In mathematics, Niven's theorem, named after Ivan Niven, states that the only rational values of Template:Mvar in the interval Template:Math for which the sine of Template:Mvar degrees is also a rational number are:[1]

sin0=0,sin30=12,sin90=1.

In radians, one would require that Template:Math, that Template:Math be rational, and that Template:Math be rational. The conclusion is then that the only such values are Template:Math, Template:Math, and Template:Math.

The theorem appears as Corollary 3.12 in Niven's book on irrational numbers.[2]

The theorem extends to the other trigonometric functions as well.[2] For rational values of Template:Mvar, the only rational values of the sine or cosine are Template:Math, Template:Math, and Template:Math; the only rational values of the secant or cosecant are Template:Math and Template:Math; and the only rational values of the tangent or cotangent are Template:Math and Template:Math.[3]

History

Niven's proof of his theorem appears in his book Irrational Numbers. Earlier, the theorem had been proven by D. H. Lehmer and J. M. H. Olmstead.[2] In his 1933 paper, Lehmer proved the theorem for the cosine by proving a more general result. Namely, Lehmer showed that for relatively prime integers Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar with Template:Math, the number Template:Math is an algebraic number of degree Template:Math, where Template:Mvar denotes Euler's totient function. Because rational numbers have degree 1, we must have Template:Math or Template:Math and therefore the only possibilities are Template:Math. Next, he proved a corresponding result for the sine using the trigonometric identity Template:Math.[4] In 1956, Niven extended Lehmer's result to the other trigonometric functions.[2] Other mathematicians have given new proofs in subsequent years.[3]

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Further reading

  1. Template:Cite journal
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Template:Cite book
  3. 3.0 3.1 A proof for the cosine case appears as Lemma 12 in Template:Cite journal
  4. Template:Cite journal