Complex lamellar vector field: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mazewaxie
m WP:GENFIXES, removed stub tag
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 22:08, 13 February 2024

In vector calculus, a complex lamellar vector field is a vector field which is orthogonal to a family of surfaces. In the broader context of differential geometry, complex lamellar vector fields are more often called hypersurface-orthogonal vector fields. They can be characterized in a number of different ways, many of which involve the curl. A lamellar vector field is a special case given by vector fields with zero curl.

The adjective "lamellar" derives from the noun "lamella", which means a thin layer. The lamellae to which "lamellar vector field" refers are the surfaces of constant potential, or in the complex case, the surfaces orthogonal to the vector field.Template:Sfnm

Complex lamellar vector fields

In vector calculus, a complex lamellar vector field is a vector field in three dimensions which is orthogonal to its own curl.Template:Sfnm That is,

𝐅(×𝐅)=0.

The term lamellar vector field is sometimes used as a synonym for the special case of an irrotational vector field, meaning thatTemplate:Sfnm

×𝐅=𝟎.

Complex lamellar vector fields are precisely those that are normal to a family of surfaces. An irrotational vector field is locally the gradient of a function, and is therefore orthogonal to the family of level surfaces (the equipotential surfaces).Template:Sfnm Any vector field can be decomposed as the sum of an irrotational vector field and a complex lamellar field.Template:Sfnm

Hypersurface-orthogonal vector fields

In greater generality, a vector field Template:Math on a pseudo-Riemannian manifold is said to be hypersurface-orthogonal if through an arbitrary point there is a smoothly embedded hypersurface which, at all of its points, is orthogonal to the vector field. By the Frobenius theorem this is equivalent to requiring that the Lie bracket of any smooth vector fields orthogonal to Template:Math is still orthogonal to Template:Math.Template:Sfnm

The condition of hypersurface-orthogonality can be rephrased in terms of the differential 1-form Template:Math which is dual to Template:Math. The previously given Lie bracket condition can be reworked to require that the exterior derivative Template:Math, when evaluated on any two tangent vectors which are orthogonal to Template:Math, is zero.Template:Sfnm This may also be phrased as the requirement that there is a smooth 1-form whose wedge product with Template:Math equals Template:Math.Template:Sfnm

Alternatively, this may be written as the condition that the differential 3-form Template:Math is zero. This can also be phrased, in terms of the Levi-Civita connection defined by the metric, as requiring that the totally anti-symmetric part of the 3-tensor field Template:Math is zero.Template:Sfnm Using a different formulation of the Frobenius theorem, it is also equivalent to require that Template:Math is locally expressible as Template:Math for some functions Template:Math and Template:Mvar.Template:Sfnm

In the special case of vector fields on three-dimensional Euclidean space, the hypersurface-orthogonal condition is equivalent to the complex lamellar condition, as seen by rewriting Template:Math in terms of the Hodge star operator as Template:Math, with Template:Math being the 1-form dual to the curl vector field.Template:Sfnm

Hypersurface-orthogonal vector fields are particularly important in general relativity, where (among other reasons) the existence of a Killing vector field which is hypersurface-orthogonal is one of the requirements of a static spacetime.Template:Sfnm In this context, hypersurface-orthogonality is sometimes called irrotationality, although this is in conflict with the standard usage in three dimensions.Template:Sfnm Another name is rotation-freeness.Template:Sfnm

An even more general notion, in the language of Pfaffian systems, is that of a completely integrable 1-form Template:Math, which amounts to the condition Template:Math as given above.Template:Sfnm In this context, there is no metric and so there is no notion of "orthogonality".

See also

Notes


References

Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend