Partially ordered ring

Template:Short description In abstract algebra, a partially ordered ring is a ring (A, +, ·), together with a compatible partial order, that is, a partial order $\le$ on the underlying set A that is compatible with the ring operations in the sense that it satisfies: $$x\le y\text{ implies }x+z\le y+z$$ and $$0\le x\text{ and }0\le y\text{ imply that }0\le x\cdot y$$ for all $x,y,z\in A$. Various extensions of this definition exist that constrain the ring, the partial order, or both. For example, an Archimedean partially ordered ring is a partially ordered ring $(A,\le )$ where Template:Nowrap partially ordered additive group is Archimedean.

An ordered ring, also called a totally ordered ring, is a partially ordered ring $(A,\le )$ where $\le$ is additionally a total order.

An l-ring, or lattice-ordered ring, is a partially ordered ring $(A,\le )$ where $\le$ is additionally a lattice order.

Properties

The additive group of a partially ordered ring is always a partially ordered group.

The set of non-negative elements of a partially ordered ring (the set of elements $x$ for which $0\le x,$ also called the positive cone of the ring) is closed under addition and multiplication, that is, if $P$ is the set of non-negative elements of a partially ordered ring, then $P+P\subseteq P$ and $P\cdot P\subseteq P.$ Furthermore, $P\cap (-P)=\{0\}.$

The mapping of the compatible partial order on a ring $A$ to the set of its non-negative elements is one-to-one; that is, the compatible partial order uniquely determines the set of non-negative elements, and a set of elements uniquely determines the compatible partial order if one exists.

If $S\subseteq A$ is a subset of a ring $A,$ and:

1. $0\in S$
2. $S\cap (-S)=\{0\}$
3. $S+S\subseteq S$
4. $S\cdot S\subseteq S$

then the relation $\le$ where $x\le y$ if and only if $y-x\in S$ defines a compatible partial order on $A$ (that is, $(A,\le )$ is a partially ordered ring).

In any l-ring, the Template:Em $|x|$ of an element $x$ can be defined to be $x\vee (-x),$ where $x\vee y$ denotes the maximal element. For any $x$ and $y,$ $$|x\cdot y|\le |x|\cdot |y|$$ holds.

f-rings

An f-ring, or Pierce–Birkhoff ring, is a lattice-ordered ring $(A,\le )$ in which $x\wedge y=0$ and $0\le z$ imply that $zx\wedge y=xz\wedge y=0$ for all $x,y,z\in A.$ They were first introduced by Garrett Birkhoff and Richard S. Pierce in 1956, in a paper titled "Lattice-ordered rings", in an attempt to restrict the class of l-rings so as to eliminate a number of pathological examples. For example, Birkhoff and Pierce demonstrated an l-ring with 1 in which 1 is not positive, even though it is a square. The additional hypothesis required of f-rings eliminates this possibility.

Example

Let $X$ be a Hausdorff space, and $𝒞(X)$ be the space of all continuous, real-valued functions on $X.$ $𝒞(X)$ is an Archimedean f-ring with 1 under the following pointwise operations: $$[f+g](x)=f(x)+g(x)$$ $$[fg](x)=f(x)\cdot g(x)$$ $$[f\wedge g](x)=f(x)\wedge g(x).$$

From an algebraic point of view the rings $𝒞(X)$ are fairly rigid. For example, localisations, residue rings or limits of rings of the form $𝒞(X)$ are not of this form in general. A much more flexible class of f-rings containing all rings of continuous functions and resembling many of the properties of these rings is the class of real closed rings.

Properties

• A direct product of f-rings is an f-ring, an l-subring of an f-ring is an f-ring, and an l-homomorphic image of an f-ring is an f-ring.

• $|xy|=|x||y|$ in an f-ring.

• The category Arf consists of the Archimedean f-rings with 1 and the l-homomorphisms that preserve the identity.

• Every ordered ring is an f-ring, so every sub-direct union of ordered rings is also an f-ring. Assuming the axiom of choice, a theorem of Birkhoff shows the converse, and that an l-ring is an f-ring if and only if it is l-isomorphic to a sub-direct union of ordered rings. Some mathematicians take this to be the definition of an f-ring.

Formally verified results for commutative ordered rings

IsarMathLib, a library for the Isabelle theorem prover, has formal verifications of a few fundamental results on commutative ordered rings. The results are proved in the ring1 context.

Suppose $(A,\le )$ is a commutative ordered ring, and $x,y,z\in A.$ Then:

	by
The additive group of $A$ is an ordered group	OrdRing_ZF_1_L4
$x\le y\text{ if and only if }x-y\le 0$	OrdRing_ZF_1_L7
$x\le y$ and $0\le z$ imply $xz\le yz$ and $zx\le zy$	OrdRing_ZF_1_L9
$0\le 1$	ordring_one_is_nonneg
$|xy|=|x||y|$	OrdRing_ZF_2_L5
$|x+y|\le |x|+|y|$	ord_ring_triangle_ineq
$x$ is either in the positive set, equal to 0 or in minus the positive set.	OrdRing_ZF_3_L2
The set of positive elements of $(A,\le )$ is closed under multiplication if and only if $A$ has no zero divisors.	OrdRing_ZF_3_L3
If $A$ is non-trivial ($0\ne 1$), then it is infinite.	ord_ring_infinite

See also

• Template:Annotated link
• Template:Annotated link
• Template:Annotated link
• Template:Annotated link
• Template:Annotated link
• Template:Annotated link
• Template:Annotated link

Further reading

• Template:Cite journal
• Gillman, Leonard; Jerison, Meyer Rings of continuous functions. Reprint of the 1960 edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 43. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1976. xiii+300 pp

External links

• Template:SpringerEOM
• Template:PlanetMath