Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 15:52, 23 January 2025

Template:Short description In physics, the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation (usually abbreviated as LLG equation), named for Lev Landau, Evgeny Lifshitz, and T. L. Gilbert, is a name used for a differential equation describing the dynamics (typically the precessional motion) of magnetization Template:Math in a solid. It is a modified version by Gilbert of the original equation of Landau and Lifshitz.[1] The LLG equation is similar to the Bloch equation, but they differ in the form of the damping term. The LLG equation describes a more general scenario of magnetization dynamics beyond the simple Larmor precession. In particular, the effective field driving the precessional motion of Template:Math is not restricted to real magnetic fields; it incorporates a wide range of mechanisms including magnetic anisotropy, exchange interaction, and so on.

The various forms of the LLG equation are commonly used in micromagnetics to model the effects of a magnetic field and other magnetic interactions on ferromagnetic materials. It provides a practical way to model the time-domain behavior of magnetic elements. Recent developments generalizes the LLG equation to include the influence of spin-polarized currents in the form of spin-transfer torque.[2]

Landau–Lifshitz equation

The terms of the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation: precession (red) and damping (blue). The trajectory of the magnetization (dotted spiral) is drawn under the simplifying assumption that the effective field Heff is constant.

In a ferromagnet, the magnitude of the magnetization Template:Math at each spacetime point is approximated by the saturation magnetization Template:Math (although it can be smaller when averaged over a chunk of volume). The LLG equation describes the rotation of the magnetization in response to the effective field Template:Math and accounts for not only a real magnetic field but also internal magnetic interactions such as exchange and anisotropy. An earlier, but equivalent, equation (the Landau–Lifshitz equation) was introduced by Template:Harvtxt:[1] Template:NumBlk where Template:Math is the electron gyromagnetic ratio and Template:Math is a phenomenological damping parameter, often replaced by

λ=αγMs,

where Template:Math is a dimensionless constant called the damping factor. The effective field Template:Math is a combination of the external magnetic field, the demagnetizing field, and various internal magnetic interactions involving quantum mechanical effects, which is typically defined as the functional derivative of the magnetic free energy with respect to the local magnetization Template:Math. To solve this equation, additional conditions for the demagnetizing field must be included to accommodate the geometry of the material.

Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation

In 1955 Gilbert replaced the damping term in the Landau–Lifshitz (LL) equation by one that depends on the time derivative of the magnetization: Template:NumBlk This is the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert (LLG) equation, where Template:Math is the damping parameter, which is characteristic of the material. It can be transformed into the Landau–Lifshitz equation:[3] Template:NumBlk where

γ=γ1+γ2η2Ms2andλ=γ2η1+γ2η2Ms2.

In this form of the LL equation, the precessional term Template:Math depends on the damping term. This better represents the behavior of real ferromagnets when the damping is large.[4][5]

Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert–Slonczewski equation

In 1996 John Slonczewski expanded the model to account for the spin-transfer torque, i.e. the torque induced upon the magnetization by spin-polarized current flowing through the ferromagnet. This is commonly written in terms of the unit moment defined by Template:Math:

𝐦˙=γ𝐦×𝐇eff+α𝐦×𝐦˙+τ𝐦×(𝐱×𝐦)|𝐱×𝐦|+τ𝐱×𝐦|𝐱×𝐦|

where α is the dimensionless damping parameter, τ and τ are driving torques, and Template:Math is the unit vector along the polarization of the current.[6][7]

References and footnotes

Template:Reflist

Further reading

Template:Refbegin

Template:Refend

  1. 1.0 1.1 Template:Cite book
  2. Template:Cite journal
  3. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Aharoni96
  4. For details of Kelly's non-resonant experiment, and of Gilbert's analysis (which led to Gilbert's modifying the damping term), see Gilbert, T. L. and Kelly, J. M. "Anomalous rotational damping in ferromagnetic sheets", Conf. Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Pittsburgh, PA, June 14–16, 1955 (New York: American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Oct. 1955, pp. 253–263). Text references to Figures 5 and 6 should have been to Tables 1 and 2. Gilbert could not fit Kelly's experiments with fixed usual gyromagnetic ratio Template:Math and a frequency-dependent Template:Math, but could fit that data for a fixed Gilbert gyromagnetic ratio Template:Math and a frequency-dependent Template:Math. Values of Template:Math as large as 9 were required, indicating very broad absorption, and thus a relatively low-quality sample. Modern samples, when analyzed from resonance absorption, give Template:Math's on the order of 0.05 or less. J. R. Mayfield, in J. Appl. Phys. Supplement to Vol. 30, 256S-257S (1959), at the top left of p.257S, writes “As was first pointed out by J. C. Slonczewski, the observed torque peak can be interpreted in terms of rotational switching effects (abrupt reorientations of M) which must occur when K/M ≤ H ≤ 2K/M.” Therefore the interpretation given by Gilbert was not universally accepted.
  5. J. Mallinson, "On damped gyromagnetic precession," in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2003-2004, July 1987, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.1987.1065181.
  6. Template:Cite journal
  7. Template:Cite journal