Feigenbaum constants: Difference between revisions
imported>Kwamikagami |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 22:44, 7 February 2025
Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates Template:Infobox non-integer number
In mathematics, specifically bifurcation theory, the Feigenbaum constants Template:IPAc-en[1] Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar are two mathematical constants which both express ratios in a bifurcation diagram for a non-linear map. They are named after the physicist Mitchell J. Feigenbaum.
History
Feigenbaum originally related the first constant to the period-doubling bifurcations in the logistic map, but also showed it to hold for all one-dimensional maps with a single quadratic maximum. As a consequence of this generality, every chaotic system that corresponds to this description will bifurcate at the same rate. Feigenbaum made this discovery in 1975,[2][3] and he officially published it in 1978.[4]
The first constant
The first Feigenbaum constant or simply Feigenbaum constant[5] Template:Mvar is the limiting ratio of each bifurcation interval to the next between every period doubling, of a one-parameter map
where Template:Math is a function parameterized by the bifurcation parameter Template:Mvar.
where Template:Mvar are discrete values of Template:Mvar at the Template:Mvarth period doubling.
This gives its numerical value: Template:OEIS
- A simple rational approximation is: Template:Sfrac, which is correct to 5 significant values (when rounding). For more precision use Template:Sfrac, which is correct to 7 significant values.
- Is approximately equal to Template:Math, with an error of 0.0047%
Illustration
Non-linear maps
To see how this number arises, consider the real one-parameter map
Here Template:Mvar is the bifurcation parameter, Template:Mvar is the variable. The values of Template:Mvar for which the period doubles (e.g. the largest value for Template:Mvar with no Template:Nowrap orbit, or the largest Template:Mvar with no Template:Nowrap orbit), are Template:Math, Template:Math etc. These are tabulated below:[7]
Template:Mvar Period Bifurcation parameter (Template:Mvar) Ratio Template:Math 1 2 0.75 — 2 4 1.25 — 3 8 Template:Val 4.2337 4 16 Template:Val 4.5515 5 32 Template:Val 4.6458 6 64 Template:Val 4.6639 7 128 Template:Val 4.6682 8 256 Template:Val 4.6689
The ratio in the last column converges to the first Feigenbaum constant. The same number arises for the logistic map
with real parameter Template:Mvar and variable Template:Mvar. Tabulating the bifurcation values again:[8]
Template:Mvar Period Bifurcation parameter (Template:Mvar) Ratio Template:Math 1 2 3 — 2 4 Template:Val — 3 8 Template:Val 4.7514 4 16 Template:Val 4.6562 5 32 Template:Val 4.6683 6 64 Template:Val 4.6686 7 128 Template:Val 4.6680 8 256 Template:Val 4.6768
Fractals

In the case of the Mandelbrot set for complex quadratic polynomial
the Feigenbaum constant is the limiting ratio between the diameters of successive circles on the real axis in the complex plane (see animation on the right).
Template:Mvar Period = Template:Math Bifurcation parameter (Template:Mvar) Ratio 1 2 Template:Val — 2 4 Template:Val — 3 8 Template:Val 4.2337 4 16 Template:Val 4.5515 5 32 Template:Val 4.6459 6 64 Template:Val 4.6639 7 128 Template:Val 4.6668 8 256 Template:Val 4.6740 9 512 Template:Val 4.6596 10 1024 Template:Val 4.6750 ... ... ... ... Template:Math Template:Val...
Bifurcation parameter is a root point of period-Template:Math component. This series converges to the Feigenbaum point Template:Mvar = −1.401155...... The ratio in the last column converges to the first Feigenbaum constant.

Other maps also reproduce this ratio; in this sense the Feigenbaum constant in bifurcation theory is analogous to [[Pi (number)|Template:Pi]] in geometry and Template:Math in calculus.
The second constant
The second Feigenbaum constant or Feigenbaum reduction parameter[5] Template:Mvar is given by: Template:OEIS
It is the ratio between the width of a tine and the width of one of its two subtines (except the tine closest to the fold). A negative sign is applied to Template:Mvar when the ratio between the lower subtine and the width of the tine is measured.[9]
These numbers apply to a large class of dynamical systems (for example, dripping faucets to population growth).[9]
A simple rational approximation is Template:Sfrac × Template:Sfrac × Template:Sfrac = Template:Sfrac.
Properties
Both numbers are believed to be transcendental, although they have not been proven to be so.[10] In fact, there is no known proof that either constant is even irrational.
The first proof of the universality of the Feigenbaum constants was carried out by Oscar Lanford—with computer-assistance—in 1982[11] (with a small correction by Jean-Pierre Eckmann and Peter Wittwer of the University of Geneva in 1987[12]). Over the years, non-numerical methods were discovered for different parts of the proof, aiding Mikhail Lyubich in producing the first complete non-numerical proof.[13]
Other values
The period-3 window in the logistic map also has a period-doubling route to chaos, reaching chaos at , and it has its own two Feigenbaum constants: .[14][15]Template:Rp
See also
Notes
References
- Alligood, Kathleen T., Tim D. Sauer, James A. Yorke, Chaos: An Introduction to Dynamical Systems, Textbooks in mathematical sciences Springer, 1996, Template:Isbn
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite thesis
- Template:Cite web
External links
- Feigenbaum constant – PlanetMath
- Julia notebook for calculating Feigenbaum constant[16]
- Template:Cite web
- Template:Cite thesis
- ↑ Template:Citation
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Template:Cite web
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Alligood, p. 503.
- ↑ Alligood, p. 504.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite thesis
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite journal
- ↑ Template:Cite book
- ↑ Template:Cite web