Steinhaus theorem: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Kaz150parrot
Fixed the proof, by using <math>B = (a,b) \cap A</math>, and minor style changes.
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 04:27, 29 September 2024

Template:Short description In the mathematical field of real analysis, the Steinhaus theorem states that the difference set of a set of positive measure contains an open neighbourhood of zero. It was first proved by Hugo Steinhaus.[1]

Statement

Let A be a Lebesgue-measurable set on the real line such that the Lebesgue measure of A is not zero. Then the difference set

AA={aba,bA}

contains an open neighbourhood of the origin.

The general version of the theorem, first proved by André Weil,[2] states that if G is a locally compact group, and A ⊂ G a subset of positive (left) Haar measure, then

AA1={ab1a,bA}

contains an open neighbourhood of unity.

The theorem can also be extended to nonmeagre sets with the Baire property. The proof of these extensions, sometimes also called Steinhaus theorem, is almost identical to the one below.

Proof

Template:Disputed section

The following simple proof can be found in a collection of problems by late professor H.M. Martirosian from the Yerevan State University, Armenia (Russian).

For any ε>0, there exists an open set 𝒰, so that A𝒰 and μ(𝒰)<μ(A)+ε. Since 𝒰 is a union of open intervals, for a given α(1/2,1), we can find an interval (a,b) such that μ(B)>α(ba), where B=(a,b)A.

Let δ=(2α1)(ba). Suppose for contradiction that there exists |x|<δ such that (x+A)A=. Then, (x+B)B=, and thus

μ((x+B)B)=2μ(B)

But, we also have

μ((x+B)B)μ((a,b+|x|))<ba+δ,

so 2μ(B)<ba+δ=2α(ba), which contradicts μ(B)>α(ba).

Hence, (x+A)A for all |x|<δ, and it follows immediately that {x:|x|<δ}AA, as desired.

Corollary

A corollary of this theorem is that any measurable proper subgroup of (,+) is of measure zero.

See also

Notes

Template:Reflist

References