Kalman–Yakubovich–Popov lemma: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Natg 19
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 23:51, 5 November 2024

The Kalman–Yakubovich–Popov lemma is a result in system analysis and control theory which states: Given a number γ>0, two n-vectors B, C and an n x n Hurwitz matrix A, if the pair (A,B) is completely controllable, then a symmetric matrix P and a vector Q satisfying

ATP+PA=QQT
PBC=γQ

exist if and only if

γ+2Re[CT(jωIA)1B]0

Moreover, the set {x:xTPx=0} is the unobservable subspace for the pair (C,A).

The lemma can be seen as a generalization of the Lyapunov equation in stability theory. It establishes a relation between a linear matrix inequality involving the state space constructs A, B, C and a condition in the frequency domain.

The Kalman–Popov–Yakubovich lemma which was first formulated and proved in 1962 by Vladimir Andreevich Yakubovich[1] where it was stated that for the strict frequency inequality. The case of nonstrict frequency inequality was published in 1963 by Rudolf E. Kálmán.[2] In that paper the relation to solvability of the Lur’e equations was also established. Both papers considered scalar-input systems. The constraint on the control dimensionality was removed in 1964 by Gantmakher and Yakubovich[3] and independently by Vasile Mihai Popov.[4] Extensive reviews of the topic can be found in [5] and in Chapter 3 of.[6]

Multivariable Kalman–Yakubovich–Popov lemma

Given An×n,Bn×m,M=MT(n+m)×(n+m) with det(jωIA)0 for all ω and (A,B) controllable, the following are equivalent:

  1. for all ω{}
    [(jωIA)1BI]*M[(jωIA)1BI]0
  2. there exists a matrix Pn×n such that P=PT and
    M+[ATP+PAPBBTP0]0.

The corresponding equivalence for strict inequalities holds even if (A,B) is not controllable. [7]


References

Template:Reflist