Multiple-conclusion logic: Difference between revisions

From testwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Psychastes
Removed {{Notability}} tag: a dedicated book by cambridge university press seems like clear evidence of meeting the WP:GNG
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 04:07, 29 April 2024

Template:Short description

A multiple-conclusion logic is one in which logical consequence is a relation, , between two sets of sentences (or propositions). ΓΔ is typically interpreted as meaning that whenever each element of Γ is true, some element of Δ is true; and whenever each element of Δ is false, some element of Γ is false.

This form of logic was developed in the 1970s by D. J. Shoesmith and Timothy Smiley[1] but has not been widely adopted.

Some logicians favor a multiple-conclusion consequence relation over the more traditional single-conclusion relation on the grounds that the latter is asymmetric (in the informal, non-mathematical sense) and favors truth over falsity (or assertion over denial).

See also

References

  1. D. J. Shoesmith and T. J. Smiley, Multiple Conclusion Logic, Cambridge University Press, 1978


Template:Logic-stub