Gödel's ontological proof: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

25 February 2025

  • curprev 21:5221:52, 25 February 2025 imported>Jochen Burghardt 34,287 bytes +34,287 Partly undid revision 1277606019 by Brent Silby (talk): the argument is strictly formal ("logical"); it is not related to any specifically christian conception of a god, but to an entity that has all "positive" (whatever that may mean) properties and none else; Category:Religious apologetics might be appropriate, but doesn't exist