View source for Mathematical beauty

{{short description|Aesthetic value of mathematics}}
[[File:Pythagorean proof (1).svg|300px|right|thumb|An example of "beauty in method"—a simple and elegant visual descriptor of the [[Pythagorean theorem]].]]

'''Mathematical beauty''' is the [[aesthetics|aesthetic]] pleasure derived from the abstractness, purity, simplicity, depth or orderliness of [[mathematics]]. Mathematicians may express this pleasure by describing mathematics (or, at least, some aspect of mathematics) as [[beauty|beautiful]] or describe mathematics as an art form, (a position taken by [[G. H. Hardy]]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Quotations/Hardy.html|title=Quotations by Hardy|website=www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk|access-date=2019-10-31}}</ref>) or, at a minimum, as a [[creativity|creative activity]].

Comparisons are  made with [[music]] and [[poetry]].

==In method==
Mathematicians commonly describe an especially pleasing method of [[Mathematical proof|proof]] as ''[[Elegant#In mathematics|elegant]]''.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2011-04-01 |title=Proof elegance - MAA Mathematical Communication MAA Mathematical Communication |url=https://mathcomm.org/general-principles-of-communicating-math/elegance/ |access-date=2024-04-28 |language=en-US}}</ref> Depending on context, this may mean:

* A proof that uses a minimum of additional assumptions or previous results.
* A proof that is unusually succinct.
* A proof that derives a result in a surprising way (e.g., from an apparently unrelated [[theorem]] or a collection of theorems).
* A proof that is based on new and original insights.
* A method of proof that can be easily generalized to solve a family of similar problems.

In the search for an elegant proof, mathematicians may search for multiple independent ways to prove a result, as the first proof that is found can often be improved. The theorem for which the greatest number of different proofs have been discovered is possibly the [[Pythagorean theorem]], with hundreds of proofs being published up to date.<ref>[[Elisha Scott Loomis]] published over 360 proofs in his book Pythagorean Proposition ({{isbn|0-873-53036-5}}).</ref> Another theorem that has been proved in many different ways is the theorem of [[quadratic reciprocity]]. In fact, [[Carl Friedrich Gauss]] alone had eight different proofs of this theorem, six of which he published.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://mathworld.wolfram.com/QuadraticReciprocityTheorem.html|title=Quadratic Reciprocity Theorem|last=Weisstein|first=Eric W.|website=mathworld.wolfram.com|language=en|access-date=2019-10-31}}</ref>

Conversely, results that are logically correct but involve laborious calculations, over-elaborate methods, highly conventional approaches or a large number of powerful [[axiom]]s or previous results are usually not considered to be elegant, and may be even referred to as ''ugly'' or ''clumsy''.

==In results==<!-- This section is linked from [[Fermat's last theorem]] -->
[[File:EulerIdentity2.svg|thumb|right|Starting at ''e''<sup>0</sup> = 1, travelling at the velocity ''i'' relative to one's position for the length of time π, and adding 1, one arrives at 0. (The diagram is an [[Argand diagram]].)]]
Some mathematicians see beauty in mathematical results that establish connections between two areas of mathematics that at first sight appear to be unrelated.{{sfnp|Rota|1997|p=173}} These results are often described as ''[[Deep result|deep]]''. While it is difficult to find universal agreement on whether a result is deep, some examples are more commonly cited than others. One such example is [[Euler's identity]]:<ref name=Gallagher2014>{{cite news|last=Gallagher|first=James|title=Mathematics: Why the brain sees maths as beauty|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-26151062|access-date=13 February 2014|newspaper=BBC News online|date=13 February 2014}}</ref>

<math display=block>\displaystyle e^{i \pi} +1 = 0\, .</math>

This [[Elegance|elegant]] expression ties together arguably the five most important [[mathematical constant]]s ({{Mvar|e}}, {{Mvar|i}}, <math>\pi</math>, 1, and 0) with the two most common mathematical symbols (+, =). Euler's identity is a special case of [[Euler's formula]], which the physicist [[Richard Feynman]] called "our jewel" and "the most remarkable formula in mathematics".<ref>{{cite book|first=Richard P.|last= Feynman|title=The Feynman Lectures on Physics |volume=I|publisher=Addison-Wesley|year=1977|isbn=0-201-02010-6|url=https://feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_22.html#Ch22-S6-p4}}</ref> Modern examples include the [[modularity theorem]], which establishes an important connection between [[elliptic curve]]s and [[modular form]]s (work on which led to the awarding of the [[Wolf Prize]] to [[Andrew Wiles]] and [[Robert Langlands]]), and "[[monstrous moonshine]]", which connects the [[Monster group]] to [[modular function]]s via [[string theory]] (for which [[Richard Borcherds]] was awarded the [[Fields Medal]]).

Other examples of deep results include unexpected insights into mathematical structures. For example, Gauss's [[Theorema Egregium]] is a deep theorem that states that the [[gaussian curvature]] is invariant under [[isometry]] of the surface. Another example is the [[fundamental theorem of calculus]]<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FundamentalTheoremsofCalculus.html|title=Fundamental Theorems of Calculus|last=Weisstein|first=Eric W.|website=mathworld.wolfram.com|language=en|access-date=2019-10-31}}</ref> (and its vector versions including [[Green's theorem]] and [[Stokes' theorem]]).

The opposite of ''deep'' is ''[[triviality (mathematics)|trivial]]''. A trivial theorem may be a result that can be derived in an obvious and straightforward way from other known results, or which applies only to a specific set of particular objects such as the [[empty set]]. In some occasions, a statement of a theorem can be original enough to be considered deep, though its proof is fairly obvious.

In his 1940 essay  ''[[A Mathematician's Apology]]'', [[G. H. Hardy]] suggested that a beautiful proof or result possesses "inevitability", "unexpectedness", and "economy".<ref>{{cite book | title=A Mathematician's Apology| chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/AMathematiciansApology-G.h.Hardy/page/n31/mode/2up|last=Hardy|first= G.H. | chapter = 18|via = Internet Archive}}</ref>

In 1997, [[Gian-Carlo Rota]], disagreed with unexpectedness as a sufficient condition for beauty and proposed a counterexample:
{{blockquote|A great many theorems of mathematics, when first published, appear to be surprising; thus for example some twenty years ago [from 1977] the proof of the existence of [[Exotic sphere|non-equivalent differentiable structures]] on spheres of high dimension was thought to be surprising, but it did not occur to anyone to call such a fact beautiful, then or now.{{sfnp|Rota|1997|p=172}} }}
In contrast, Monastyrsky wrote in 2001:
{{blockquote|It is very difficult to find an analogous invention in the past to [[Milnor]]'s beautiful construction of the different differential structures on the seven-dimensional sphere... The original proof of Milnor was not very constructive, but later E. Brieskorn showed that these differential structures can be described in an extremely explicit and beautiful form.<ref>{{citation|last = Monastyrsky|title=Some Trends in Modern Mathematics and the Fields Medal|year = 2001}}</ref>}}
This disagreement illustrates both the subjective nature of mathematical beauty and its connection with mathematical results: in this case, not only the existence of exotic spheres, but also a particular realization of them.

==In experience==
[[File:Compound of five cubes.png|thumb|222px|A "cold and austere beauty" has been attributed to the [[compound of five cubes]]]]
{{tone|section|date=March 2013}}
Interest in [[pure mathematics]] that is separate from [[Empirical research|empirical]] study has been part of the experience [[History of mathematics|of various civilizations]], including that of the [[Greek mathematics|ancient Greeks]], who "did mathematics for the beauty of it".<ref>Lang, p. 3</ref> The aesthetic pleasure that [[mathematical physicist]]s tend to experience in Einstein's theory of [[general relativity]] has been attributed (by [[Paul Dirac]], among others) to its "great mathematical beauty".<ref>Chandrasekhar, p. 148</ref> The beauty of mathematics is experienced when the [[reality|physical reality]] of objects are represented by [[mathematical models]]. [[Group theory]], developed in the early 1800s for the sole purpose of solving [[polynomial]] equations, became a fruitful way of categorizing [[elementary particle]]s—the building blocks of matter. Similarly, the study of [[knot theory|knots]] provides important insights into [[string theory]] and [[loop quantum gravity]].{{citation needed|date=November 2022}}

Some{{who|date=November 2022}} believe that in order to appreciate mathematics, one must engage in doing mathematics.<ref>{{cite book|last=Phillips|first=George|title=Mathematics Is Not a Spectator Sport|publisher=[[Springer Science+Business Media]]|year=2005|chapter=Preface|isbn=0-387-25528-1|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=psFwdN6V6icC&q=there+is+nothing+in+the+world+of+mathematics+that+corresponds+to+an+audience+in+a+concert+hall,+where+the+passive+listen+to+the+active.+Happily,+mathematicians+are+all+doers,+not+spectators.&pg=PR7|access-date=2008-08-22|quote="...there is nothing in the world of mathematics that corresponds to an audience in a concert hall, where the passive listen to the active. Happily, mathematicians are all ''doers'', not spectators.}}</ref>

For example, [[Math Circle|Math Circles]] are after-school enrichment programs where students engage with mathematics through lectures and activities; there are also some teachers who encourage [[student engagement]] by teaching mathematics in [[kinesthetic learning]]. In a general Math Circle lesson, students use pattern finding, observation, and exploration to make their own mathematical discoveries. For example, mathematical beauty arises in a Math Circle activity on [[symmetry]] designed for 2nd and 3rd graders, where students create their own snowflakes by folding a square piece of paper and cutting out designs of their choice along the edges of the folded paper. When the paper is unfolded, a symmetrical design reveals itself. In a day to day elementary school mathematics class, symmetry can be presented as such in an artistic manner where students see aesthetically pleasing results in mathematics.{{citation needed|date=November 2022}}

Some{{who|date=November 2022}} teachers prefer to use [[mathematical manipulatives]] to present mathematics in an aesthetically pleasing way. Examples of a manipulative include [[algebra tiles]], [[cuisenaire rods]], and [[pattern blocks]]. For example, one can teach the method of [[completing the square]] by using algebra tiles. Cuisenaire rods can be used to teach fractions, and pattern blocks can be used to teach geometry. Using mathematical manipulatives helps students gain a conceptual understanding that might not be seen immediately in written mathematical formulas.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Sowell | first1 = E | year = 1989 | title = Effects of Manipulative Materials in Mathematics Instruction | journal = Journal for Research in Mathematics Education | volume = 20 | issue = 5| pages = 498–505 | doi=10.2307/749423| jstor = 749423 }}</ref>

Another example of beauty in experience involves the use of [[origami]]. Origami, the art of paper folding, has aesthetic qualities and many mathematical connections. One can study the [[mathematics of paper folding]] by observing the [[crease pattern]] on unfolded origami pieces.<ref>Hull, Thomas. "Project Origami: Activities for Exploring Mathematics". Taylor & Francis, 2006.</ref>

[[Combinatorics]], the study of counting, has artistic representations which some{{who|date=November 2022}} find mathematically beautiful. There are many visual examples which illustrate combinatorial concepts. Some of the topics and objects seen in combinatorics courses with visual representations include, among others [[Four color theorem]], [[Young tableau]], [[Permutohedron]],  [[Graph theory]],  [[Partition of a set]].<ref>{{cite book|last =Brualdi|first= Richard|title =Introductory Combinatorics|publisher= Pearson|date= 2009|isbn =978-0136020400}}</ref>

Brain imaging experiments conducted by Semir Zeki and his colleagues<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Zeki |first1=Semir |last2=Romaya |first2=John Paul |last3=Benincasa |first3=Dionigi M. T. |last4=Atiyah |first4=Michael F. |date=2014 |title=The experience of mathematical beauty and its neural correlates |journal=Frontiers in Human Neuroscience |volume=8 |page=68 |doi=10.3389/fnhum.2014.00068 |pmid=24592230 |pmc=3923150 |issn=1662-5161|doi-access=free }}</ref> show that the experience of mathematical beauty has, as a neural correlate, activity in field A1 of the medial orbito-frontal cortex (mOFC) of the brain and that this activity is parametrically related to the declared intensity of beauty. The location of the activity is similar to the location of the activity that correlates with the experience of beauty from other sources, such as music or joy or sorrow. Moreover, mathematicians seem resistant to revising their judgment of the beauty of a mathematical formula in light of contradictory opinion given by their peers.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Zhang |first1=Haoxuan |last2=Zeki |first2=Semir |date=May 2022 |title=Judgments of mathematical beauty are resistant to revision through external opinion |journal=PsyCh Journal |volume=11 |issue=5 |pages=741–747 |doi=10.1002/pchj.556 |pmid=35491015 |pmc=9790661 |issn=2046-0252|doi-access=free }}</ref>

==In philosophy==
Some{{who|date=November 2022}} mathematicians are of the opinion that the doing of mathematics is closer to discovery than invention, for example:
{{blockquote|There is no scientific discoverer, no poet, no painter, no musician, who will not tell you that he found ready made his discovery or poem or picture—that it came to him from outside, and that he did not consciously create it from within.
|[[William Kingdon Clifford]], from a lecture to the Royal Institution titled "Some of the conditions of mental development"}}
These mathematicians believe that the detailed and precise results of mathematics may be reasonably taken to be true without any dependence on the universe in which we live. For example, they would argue that the theory of the [[natural numbers]] is fundamentally valid, in a way that does not require any specific context. Some mathematicians have extrapolated this viewpoint that mathematical beauty is truth further, in some cases becoming [[mysticism]].

In [[Plato]]'s philosophy there were two worlds, the physical one in which we live and another abstract world which contained unchanging truth, including mathematics. He believed that the physical world was a mere reflection of the more perfect abstract world.<ref>{{Citation|last=Linnebo|first=Øystein|title=Platonism in the Philosophy of Mathematics|date=2018|url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/platonism-mathematics/|encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|editor-last=Zalta|editor-first=Edward N.|edition=Spring 2018|publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University|access-date=2019-10-31}}</ref>

[[Hungary|Hungarian]] mathematician [[Paul Erdős]]<ref>{{cite book | author=Schechter, Bruce | title=My brain is open: The mathematical journeys of Paul Erdős | publisher=[[Simon & Schuster]] | location=New York | year=2000 | pages=70–71 | isbn = 0-684-85980-7}}</ref> spoke of an imaginary book, in which God has written down all the most beautiful mathematical proofs. When Erdős wanted to express particular appreciation of a proof, he would exclaim "This one's from The Book!"

Twentieth-century French philosopher [[Alain Badiou]] claimed that [[ontology]] is mathematics.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/alain-badiou-ontology-structuralism/|title=Alain Badiou: Ontology and Structuralism|date=2014-04-02|website=Ceasefire Magazine|language=en-US|access-date=2019-10-31}}</ref> Badiou also believes in deep connections between mathematics, poetry and philosophy.

In many cases, natural philosophers and other scientists who have made extensive use of mathematics have made leaps of inference between beauty and physical truth in ways that turned out to be erroneous. For example, at one stage in his life, [[Johannes Kepler]] believed that the proportions of the orbits of the then-known planets in the [[Solar System]] have been arranged by [[God]] to correspond to a concentric arrangement of the five [[Platonic solid]]s, each orbit lying on the [[Circumscribed sphere|circumsphere]] of one [[polyhedron]] and the [[Inscribed sphere|insphere]] of another. As there are exactly five Platonic solids, Kepler's hypothesis could only accommodate six planetary orbits and was disproved by the subsequent discovery of [[Uranus]].

==Analysis of beauty in mathematics==
[[G. H. Hardy]]<ref>{{cite book | author=Hardy, G. H. | title=A Mathematician's Apology | publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | location=Cambridge | year=1940 }}</ref>  analysed the beauty of mathematical proofs into these six dimensions: general, serious, deep, unexpected, inevitable, economical (simple). [[Paul Ernest]]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://atm.org.uk/write/MediaUploads/Journals/MT248/MT248-15-10.pdf|title=Paul Ernest: Mathematics and Beauty|date=2015-09-01|website=Mathematics Teaching |language=en-UK|access-date=2024-09-15}}</ref> proposes seven dimensions for any mathematical objects, including concepts, theorems, proofs and theories. These are
1.	Economy, simplicity, brevity, succinctness, elegance;
2.	Generality, abstraction, power;
3.	Surprise, ingenuity, cleverness;
4.	Pattern, structure, symmetry, regularity, visual design;
5.	Logicality, rigour, tight reasoning and deduction, pure thought;
6.	Interconnectedness, links, unification;
7.	Applicability, modelling power, empirical generality.
He argues that individual mathematicians and communities of mathematicians will have preferred choices from this list. Some, like Hardy, will reject some (Hardy claimed that applied mathematics is ugly). However, Rentuya Sa and colleagues<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Rentuya Sa, Lara Alcock, Matthew Inglis and Fenner Stanley Tanswell: Do Mathematicians Agree about Mathematical Beauty?|date=2024-02-21|doi=10.1007/s13164-022-00669-3|journal=[[Review of Philosophy and Psychology]] |language=en-US|doi-access=free}}</ref> compared the views of British mathematicians and undergraduates and Chinese mathematicians on the beauty of 20 well known equations and found a strong measure of agreement between their views.

==In information theory==
In the 1970s, [[Abraham Moles]] and [[Frieder Nake]] analyzed links between beauty, [[Information processing (psychology)|information processing]], and [[information theory]].<ref>A. Moles: ''Théorie de l'information et perception esthétique'', Paris, Denoël, 1973 ([[Information Theory]] and aesthetical perception)</ref><ref>F Nake (1974). Ästhetik als Informationsverarbeitung. ([[Aesthetics]] as information processing). Grundlagen und Anwendungen der Informatik im Bereich ästhetischer Produktion und Kritik. Springer, 1974, {{isbn|3-211-81216-4}}, {{isbn |978-3-211-81216-7}}</ref> In the 1990s, [[Jürgen Schmidhuber]] formulated a mathematical theory of observer-dependent subjective beauty based on [[algorithmic information theory]]: the most beautiful objects among subjectively comparable objects have short [[algorithmic information theory |algorithmic]] descriptions (i.e., [[Kolmogorov complexity]]) relative to what the observer already knows.<ref>J. Schmidhuber. [[Low-complexity art]]. [[Leonardo (journal)|Leonardo]], Journal of the International Society for the Arts, Sciences, and Technology ([[Leonardo, The International Society of the Arts, Sciences and Technology|Leonardo/ISAST]]), 30(2):97–103, 1997. {{doi|10.2307/1576418}}. {{JSTOR |1576418}}.</ref><ref>J. Schmidhuber. Papers on the theory of beauty and [[low-complexity art]] since 1994: http://www.idsia.ch/~juergen/beauty.html</ref><ref>J. Schmidhuber. Simple Algorithmic Principles of Discovery, Subjective Beauty, Selective Attention, Curiosity & Creativity. Proc. 10th Intl. Conf. on Discovery Science (DS 2007) pp. 26–38, LNAI 4755, Springer, 2007. Also in Proc. 18th Intl. Conf. on Algorithmic Learning Theory (ALT 2007) p. 32, LNAI 4754, Springer, 2007. Joint invited lecture for DS 2007 and ALT 2007, Sendai, Japan, 2007. {{arXiv|0709.0674}}.</ref> Schmidhuber explicitly distinguishes between beautiful and interesting. The latter corresponds to the [[first derivative]] of subjectively perceived beauty: the observer continually tries to improve the [[predictability]] and [[Data compression|compressibility]] of the observations by discovering regularities such as repetitions and [[symmetries]] and [[fractal]] [[self-similarity]]. Whenever the observer's learning process (possibly a predictive artificial [[neural network]]) leads to improved data compression such that the observation sequence can be described by fewer [[bit]]s than before, the temporary interesting-ness of the data corresponds to the compression progress, and is proportional to the observer's internal curiosity reward.<ref>{{cite conference|first =J.|last= Schmidhuber|title = Curious model-building control systems |conference= International Joint Conference on Neural Networks|location= Singapore|volume= 2|pages= 1458–1463 |publisher= IEEE press|date= 1991|doi=10.1109/IJCNN.1991.170605}}</ref><ref>Schmidhuber's theory of beauty and curiosity in a German TV show: http://www.br-online.de/bayerisches-fernsehen/faszination-wissen/schoenheit--aesthetik-wahrnehmung-ID1212005092828.xml {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080603221058/http://www.br-online.de/bayerisches-fernsehen/faszination-wissen/schoenheit--aesthetik-wahrnehmung-ID1212005092828.xml |date=June 3, 2008 }}</ref>

==In the arts==
 {{Main|Mathematics and art|Mathematics and music|Mathematics and architecture}}

===Music===
Examples of the use of mathematics in music include the [[stochastic music]] of [[Iannis Xenakis]], the [[Fibonacci number|Fibonacci sequence]] in [[Tool (band)|Tool]]'s [[Lateralus (song)|Lateralus]], counterpoint of [[Johann Sebastian Bach]], [[polyrhythm]]ic structures (as in [[Igor Stravinsky]]'s ''[[The Rite of Spring]]''), the [[Metric modulation]] of [[Elliott Carter]], [[permutation]] theory in [[serialism]] beginning with [[Arnold Schoenberg]], and application of Shepard tones in [[Karlheinz Stockhausen]]'s ''[[Hymnen]]''.  They also include the application of [[Group theory]] to transformations in music in the theoretical writings of [[David Lewin]].

===Visual arts===
[[File:Della Pittura Alberti perspective pillars on grid.jpg|thumb|Diagram from [[Leon Battista Alberti]]'s 1435 ''[[Della Pittura]]'', with pillars in [[Perspective (graphical)|perspective]] on a grid]]

Examples of the use of mathematics in the visual arts include applications of [[chaos theory]] and [[fractal]] geometry to [[digital art|computer-generated art]], symmetry studies of [[Leonardo da Vinci]], [[projective geometry|projective geometries]] in development of the [[Perspective (graphical)|perspective]] theory of [[Renaissance]] art, [[grid (page layout)|grids]] in [[Op art]], optical geometry in the [[camera obscura]] of [[Giambattista della Porta]], and multiple perspective in analytic [[cubism]] and [[futurism]].

[[Sacred geometry]] is a field of its own, giving rise to countless art forms including some of the best known mystic symbols and religious motifs, and has a particularly rich history in [[Islamic architecture]].  It also provides a means of meditation and comtemplation, for example the study of the [[Kaballah]] [[Sefirot]] (Tree Of Life) and [[Metatron's Cube]]; and also the act of drawing itself.

The Dutch graphic designer [[M. C. Escher]] created mathematically inspired [[woodcut]]s, [[lithograph]]s, and [[mezzotint]]s. These feature impossible constructions, explorations of [[infinity]], architecture, visual [[paradox]]es and [[tessellation]]s.

Some painters and sculptors create work distorted with the mathematical principles of [[anamorphosis]], including South African sculptor [[Jonty Hurwitz]].

British constructionist artist [[John Ernest]] created reliefs and paintings inspired by group theory.<ref>John Ernest's use of mathematics and especially group theory in his art works is analysed in ''John Ernest, A Mathematical Artist'' by Paul Ernest in ''Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal'', No. 24 Dec. 2009 (Special Issue on Mathematics and Art):  https://www.exeter.ac.uk/research/groups/education/pmej/pome24/index.htm</ref> A number of other British artists of the constructionist and systems schools of thought also draw on mathematics models and structures as a source of inspiration, including [[Anthony Hill (artist)|Anthony Hill]] and [[Peter Lowe (artist)|Peter Lowe]].<ref>{{Cite book|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oJU4DwAAQBAJ&q=anthony+hill+and+peter+lowe&pg=PT61|title=Generative Systems Art: The Work of Ernest Edmonds|last=Franco|first=Francesca|date=2017-10-05|publisher=Routledge|isbn=9781317137436|language=en|chapter=The Systems Group (Chapter 2)}}</ref> Computer-generated art is based on mathematical [[algorithm]]s.

==Quotes by mathematicians==
[[Bertrand Russell]] expressed his sense of mathematical beauty in these words:
<blockquote>
Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme beauty—a beauty cold and austere, like that of sculpture, without appeal to any part of our weaker nature, without the gorgeous trappings of painting or music, yet sublimely pure, and capable of a stern perfection such as only the greatest art can show. The true spirit of delight, the exaltation, the sense of being more than Man, which is the touchstone of the highest excellence, is to be found in mathematics as surely as poetry.<ref>{{cite book|last=Russell|first=Bertrand|author-link=Bertrand Russell|title=Mysticism and Logic: And Other Essays|publisher=[[Longman]]|year=1919|page=[https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_zwMQAAAAYAAJ/page/n68 60]|chapter=The Study of Mathematics|url=https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_zwMQAAAAYAAJ|quote=Mathematics rightly viewed possesses not only truth but supreme beauty a beauty cold and austere like that of sculpture without appeal to any part of our weaker nature without the gorgeous trappings Russell.|access-date=2008-08-22}}</ref>
</blockquote>

[[Paul Erdős]] expressed his views on the [[ineffability]] of mathematics when he said, "Why are numbers beautiful? It's like asking why is [[Symphony No. 9 (Beethoven)|Beethoven's Ninth Symphony]] beautiful. If you don't see why, someone can't tell you. I ''know'' numbers are beautiful. If they aren't beautiful, nothing is".<ref>{{cite book|last=Devlin|first=Keith| author-link= Keith Devlin|title=The Math Gene: How Mathematical Thinking Evolved And Why Numbers Are Like Gossip|publisher=[[Basic Books]]|year=2000|page=[https://archive.org/details/mathgene00keit/page/140 140]|chapter=Do Mathematicians Have Different Brains?|url=https://archive.org/details/mathgene00keit|url-access=registration|access-date=2008-08-22|isbn=978-0-465-01619-8}}</ref>

==See also==
{{div col|colwidth=20em}}
* [[Argument from beauty]]
* [[Cellular automaton]]
* [[Descriptive science]]
* [[Fluency heuristic]]
* [[Golden ratio]]
* [[Mathematics and architecture]]
* [[Neuroesthetics]]
* [[Normative science]]
* [[Philosophy of mathematics]]
* [[Processing fluency theory of aesthetic pleasure]]
* [[Pythagoreanism]]
* [[Theory of everything]]
{{div col end}}

==Notes==
{{reflist|2}}

==References==
{{refbegin}}
* [[Martin Aigner|Aigner, Martin]], and [[Günter M. Ziegler|Ziegler, Gunter M.]] (2003), ''[[Proofs from THE BOOK]],'' 3rd edition, Springer-Verlag.
* [[Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar|Chandrasekhar, Subrahmanyan]] (1987), ''Truth and Beauty: Aesthetics and Motivations in Science,'' University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
* [[Jacques Hadamard|Hadamard, Jacques]] (1949), ''The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field,'' 1st edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 2nd edition, 1949. Reprinted, Dover Publications, New York, NY, 1954.
* [[G. H. Hardy|Hardy, G.H.]] (1940), ''A Mathematician's Apology'', 1st published, 1940. Reprinted, [[C. P. Snow]] (foreword), 1967. Reprinted, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1992.
* [[Paul Hoffman (science writer)|Hoffman, Paul]] (1992), ''[[The Man Who Loved Only Numbers]]'', Hyperion.
* Huntley, H.E. (1970), ''The Divine Proportion: A Study in Mathematical Beauty'', Dover Publications, New York, NY.
* [[Serge Lang|Lang, Serge]] (1985). [https://books.google.com/books?id=U_HITkWziLwC ''The Beauty of Doing Mathematics: Three Public Dialogues'']. New York: Springer-Verlag. {{isbn|0-387-96149-6}}.
* [[Elisha Scott Loomis|Loomis, Elisha Scott]] (1968), ''The Pythagorean Proposition'', The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Contains 365 proofs of the Pythagorean Theorem.
*{{Cite journal
| last1 = Monastyrsky
| first1 = Michael
| title = Some Trends in Modern Mathematics and the Fields Medal
| journal = Can. Math. Soc. Notes
| year = 2001
| volume = 33
| issue = 2 and 3
| url = http://www.fields.utoronto.ca/aboutus/FieldsMedal_Monastyrsky.pdf
}}
* [[S.K. Pandey|Pandey, S.K.]] . [https://books.google.com/books?id=BgYbzAEACAAJ ''The Humming of Mathematics: Melody of Mathematics'']. Independently Published, 2019. {{ISBN|1710134437}}.
* Peitgen, H.-O., and Richter, P.H. (1986), ''The Beauty of Fractals'', Springer-Verlag.
* {{cite journal | last1 = Reber | first1 = R. | author-link = Rolf Reber | last2 = Brun | first2 = M. | last3 = Mitterndorfer | first3 = K. | year = 2008 | title = The use of heuristics in intuitive mathematical judgment | journal = Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | volume = 15 | issue = 6| pages = 1174–1178 | doi = 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1174 | pmid = 19001586 | hdl = 1956/2734 | s2cid = 5297500 | hdl-access = free }}
* {{Cite journal
| last = Rota
| first = Gian-Carlo
| author-link = Gian-Carlo Rota
| title = The phenomenology of mathematical beauty
| year = 1997
| journal = Synthese
| volume = 111
| issue = 2
| pages = 171–182
| doi = 10.1023/A:1004930722234
| jstor = 20117626 
| s2cid = 44064821
}}
* Strohmeier, John, and Westbrook, Peter (1999), ''Divine Harmony, The Life and Teachings of Pythagoras'', Berkeley Hills Books, Berkeley, CA.
{{refend}}

==Further reading==
*{{Citation | last=Cellucci | first= Carlo | title= Mathematical beauty, understanding, and discovery | journal= [[Foundations of Science]] | volume= 20 | pages= 339–355 | year= 2015 | issue= 4 | doi= 10.1007/s10699-014-9378-7| s2cid= 120068870 }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Martin Gardner |date=April 1, 2007 |title=Is Beauty Truth and Truth Beauty? |url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-beauty-truth-and-truth/ |journal=Scientific American}}
*{{Cite book |last=Stewart |first=Ian |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/76481488 |title=Why beauty is truth : a history of symmetry |publisher=Basic Books, a member of the Perseus Books Group |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-465-08236-0 |location=New York |oclc=76481488}}
*{{Citation | last1= Zeki | first1= S. | last2=  Romaya | first2=  J. P. | last3= Benincasa | first3= D. M. T. | last4=  Atiyah | first4= M. F. | author-link1= Semir Zeki | author-link4=  Michael Atiyah | title= The experience of mathematical beauty and its neural correlates | journal= Frontiers in Human Neuroscience | volume= 8 | year= 2014 | page= 68 | doi= 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00068| pmc= 3923150 | pmid=24592230| doi-access= free }}

==External links==
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20151209130947/http://raharoni.net.technion.ac.il/mathematics-poetry-and-beauty/ Mathematics, Poetry and Beauty]
*[http://www.cut-the-knot.org/manifesto/beauty.shtml Is Mathematics Beautiful?] cut-the-knot.org
*[http://www.justinmullins.com/ Justin Mullins.com]
*[http://www.the-athenaeum.org/poetry/detail.php?id=80 Edna St. Vincent Millay (poet): ''Euclid alone has looked on beauty bare'']
*[[Terence Tao]], [https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0702396 ''What is good mathematics?'']
*[http://mathbeauty.wordpress.com/ Mathbeauty Blog]
*{{Internet Archive collection|id=aestheticappeal|name=Aesthetic Appeal}}
*[http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/dec/05/mathematical-romance/ ''A Mathematical Romance''] [[Jim Holt (philosopher)|Jim Holt]] December 5, 2013 issue of [[The New York Review of Books]] review of ''Love and Math: The Heart of Hidden Reality'' by [[Edward Frenkel]]

{{aesthetics}}
{{mathematical art}}

[[Category:Aesthetic beauty]]
[[Category:Elementary mathematics]]
[[Category:Philosophy of mathematics]]
[[Category:Mathematical terminology]]
[[Category:Mathematics and art]]