View source for Landau pole

{{short description|Coupling constant divergence at high energies}}
In [[physics]], the '''Landau pole''' (or the '''Moscow zero''', or the '''Landau ghost''')<ref>{{cite web |url=http://oxfordindex.oup.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100049732 |title=Landau ghost – Oxford Index |access-date=2017-12-27 |archive-date=2017-12-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171228054634/http://oxfordindex.oup.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100049732 |url-status=dead }}</ref> is the [[energy scale|momentum (or energy) scale]] at which the [[coupling constant]] (interaction strength) of a [[quantum field theory]] becomes infinite. Such a possibility was pointed out by the physicist [[Lev Landau]] and his colleagues in 1954.<ref name="LAKh">{{cite journal |last1=Landau|first1=L. D. |last2=Abrikosov|first2=A. A. |last3=Khalatnikov|first3=I. M. |title=On the elimination of infinities in quantum electrodynamics (Об устранении бесконечностей в квантовой электродинамике) |journal=Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences (Доклады Академии Наук СССР)  |volume=95 |issue=3 |pages=497–500 |year=1954 }}</ref><ref>[[Lev Landau]], in {{cite book| title=Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics|editor=Wolfgang Pauli|editor-link=Wolfgang Pauli|publisher=Pergamon Press| year=1955| location=London}}</ref> The fact that couplings depend on the momentum (or length) scale is the central idea behind the [[renormalization group]].

Landau poles appear in theories that are not [[asymptotic freedom|asymptotically free]], such as [[quantum electrodynamics]] (QED) or {{math|''φ''<sup>4</sup>}} theory—a [[scalar field]] with a [[quartic interaction]]—such as may describe the [[Higgs boson]]. In these theories, the renormalized coupling constant grows with energy. A Landau pole appears when the coupling becomes infinite at a finite energy scale. In a theory purporting to be complete, this could be considered a mathematical inconsistency. A possible solution is that the renormalized charge could go to zero as the cut-off is removed, meaning that the charge is completely screened by quantum fluctuations ([[vacuum polarization]]). This is a case of [[quantum triviality]],<ref name="TrivPurs">
{{cite journal
 | last=Callaway | first=D. J. E. 
 | year=1988
 | title=Triviality Pursuit: Can Elementary Scalar Particles Exist?
 | journal=[[Physics Reports]]
 | volume=167
 | issue=5 | pages=241–320
 | doi=10.1016/0370-1573(88)90008-7
 |bibcode = 1988PhR...167..241C | author-link=David J E Callaway
}}</ref> which means that quantum corrections completely suppress the interactions in the absence of a cut-off.

Since the Landau pole is normally identified through [[perturbation theory (quantum mechanics)|perturbative]] one-loop or two-loop calculations, it is possible that the pole is merely a sign that the perturbative approximation breaks down at strong coupling. Perturbation theory may also be invalid if [[Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics)#Non-adiabatic states|non-adiabatic states]] exist. [[Lattice gauge theory]] provides a means to address questions in quantum field theory beyond the realm of perturbation theory, and thus has been used to attempt to resolve this question.

Numerical computations performed in this framework seem to confirm Landau's conclusion that in QED the renormalized charge completely vanishes for an infinite cutoff.<ref>
{{cite journal | doi = 10.1016/0550-3213(86)90431-1 | title =CAN elementary scalar particles exist?: (II). Scalar electrodynamics | journal = Nuclear Physics B| volume = 277| issue = 1| pages = 50–66| year = 1986| last1 = Callaway | first1 = D. J. E. | last2 = Petronzio | first2 = R. |bibcode = 1986NuPhB.277...50C | url =https://cds.cern.ch/record/167168 }}</ref><ref>
{{cite journal |last1=Göckeler|first1=M. |last2=Horsley|first2=R. |last3=Linke|first3=V. |last4=Rakow|first4=P. |last5=Schierholz|first5=G. |last6=Stüben|first6=H. |s2cid=119494925 |year=1998|title=Is There a Landau Pole Problem in QED?|journal=[[Physical Review Letters]]|volume=80|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4119| pages=4119–4122| bibcode=1998PhRvL..80.4119G|arxiv = hep-th/9712244|issue=19 }}</ref><ref>
{{cite journal| last1=Kim| first1=S. |last2=Kogut |first2=John B. |last3=Lombardo |first3=Maria Paola | s2cid=15420646 |date=2002-01-31|journal=[[Physical Review D]]| doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.65.054015|volume=65|pages=054015|arxiv = hep-lat/0112009 |bibcode = 2002PhRvD..65e4015K| title=Gauged Nambu–Jona-Lasinio studies of the triviality of quantum electrodynamics|issue=5 }}</ref><ref>
{{cite journal| last1=Gies| first1=Holger|last2=Jaeckel| first2=Joerg| s2cid=222197| title=Renormalization Flow of QED| journal=[[Physical Review Letters]]| date=2004-09-09| volume=93| doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.110405 | page=110405| bibcode=2004PhRvL..93k0405G|arxiv = hep-ph/0405183|issue=11| pmid=15447325}}</ref>

== Brief history ==
According to Landau, [[Alexei Alexeyevich Abrikosov|Abrikosov]], and [[Isaak Markovich Khalatnikov|Khalatnikov]],<ref name="LAKh"></ref> the relation of the observable charge {{math|''g''<sub>obs</sub>}} to the "bare" charge {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub>}} for renormalizable field theories when {{math|Λ ≫ ''m''}} is given by
{{NumBlk||<math display="block"> g_\text{obs}=\frac{g_0}{1+\beta_2 g_0 \ln \Lambda/m} </math>|{{EquationRef|1}}}}
where {{mvar|m}} is the mass of the particle and {{math|Λ}} is the momentum cut-off. If {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub> < ∞}} and {{math|Λ → ∞ }} then {{math|''g''<sub>obs</sub> → 0}} and the theory looks trivial. In fact, inverting {{EquationNote|1|Eq.&nbsp;1}}, so that {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub>}} (related to the length scale {{math|Λ<sup>−1</sup>}}) reveals an accurate value of {{math|''g''<sub>obs</sub>}},
{{NumBlk||<math display="block"> g_0 = \frac{g_\text{obs}}{1-\beta_2 g_\text{obs} \ln \Lambda/m}. </math>|{{EquationRef|2}}}}

As {{math|Λ}} grows, the bare charge {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub> {{=}} ''g''(Λ)}} increases, to finally diverge at the renormalization point
{{NumBlk||<math display="block"> \Lambda_\text{Landau} = m \exp\left[ \frac{1}{\beta_2 g_\text{obs}} \right].</math>|{{EquationRef|3}}}}

This singularity is the '''Landau pole''' with a ''negative residue'', {{math|''g''(Λ) ≈ −Λ<sub>Landau</sub> / (''β''<sub>2</sub>(Λ − Λ<sub>Landau</sub>))}}.

In fact, however, the growth of {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub>}} invalidates {{EquationNote|1|Eqs.&nbsp;1}},&nbsp;{{EquationNote|2}} in the region {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub> ≈ 1}}, since these were obtained for {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub> ≪ 1}}, so that the nonperturbative existence of the Landau pole becomes questionable.

The actual behavior of the charge {{math|''g''(''μ'')}} as a function of the momentum scale {{mvar|μ}} is determined by the [[Murray Gell-Mann|Gell-Mann]]–[[Francis E. Low|Low]] equation<ref name="GellMannLow" >{{cite journal|last1=Gell-Mann| first1=M.| last2=Low| first2=F. E.| year=1954| journal=[[Physical Review]]| title=Quantum Electrodynamics at Small Distances | volume=95| doi=10.1103/PhysRev.95.1300| pages=1300–1320| bibcode = 1954PhRv...95.1300G | issue=5| url=https://authors.library.caltech.edu/60469/1/PhysRev.95.1300.pdf| author1-link=Murray Gell-Mann}}</ref>
{{NumBlk||<math display="block"> \frac{\mathrm{d}g}{\mathrm{d} \ln \mu} = \beta(g) = \beta_2 g^2 + \beta_3 g^3 + \cdots </math>|{{EquationRef|4}}}}
which gives Eqs.&nbsp;{{EquationNote|1}},&nbsp;{{EquationNote|2}} if it is integrated under conditions {{math|''g''(''μ'') {{=}} ''g''<sub>obs</sub>}} for {{math|''μ'' {{=}} ''m''}} and {{math|''g''(''μ'') {{=}} ''g''<sub>0</sub>}} for {{math|''μ'' {{=}} Λ}}, when only the term with {{math|''β''<sub>2</sub>}} is retained in the right hand side. The general behavior of {{math|''g''(''μ'')}} depends on the appearance of the function {{math|''β''(''g'')}}.

According to the classification of Bogoliubov and Shirkov,<ref>{{cite book |authorlink1=Nikolay Bogolyubov |last1=Bogoliubov|first1=N. N. |authorlink2=Dmitry Shirkov |last2=Shirkov|first2=D. V. |title=Introduction to the Theory of Quantized Fields |edition=3rd |others=Translated by Seweryn Chomet |publisher=[[Wiley (publisher)|Wiley]] |location=New York |year=1980}}</ref> there are three qualitatively different cases:
{{ordered list | list-style-type = lower-alpha
| if {{math|''β''(''g'')}} has a zero at the finite value {{math|''g''<sup>∗</sup>}}, then growth of {{mvar|g}} is saturated, i.e. {{math|''g''(''μ'') → ''g''<sup>∗</sup>}} for {{math|''μ'' → ∞}};
| if {{math|''β''(''g'')}} is non-alternating and behaves as {{math|''β''(''g'') ∝ ''g<sup>α</sup>''}} with {{math|''α'' ≤ 1}} for large {{mvar|g}}, then the growth of {{math|''g''(''μ'')}} continues to infinity;
| if {{math|''β''(''g'') ∝ ''g<sup>α</sup>''}} with {{math|''α'' > 1}} for large {{mvar|g}}, then {{math|''g''(''μ'')}} is divergent at finite value {{math|''μ''<sub>0</sub>}} and the real Landau pole arises: the theory is internally inconsistent due to indeterminacy of {{math|''g''(''μ'')}} for {{math|''μ'' > ''μ''<sub>0</sub>}}.
}}
Landau and [[Isaak Pomeranchuk|Pomeranchuk]]<ref>L.D.Landau, I.Ya.Pomeranchuk, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 102, 489 (1955); I.Ya.Pomeranchuk, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 103, 1005 (1955).</ref> tried to justify the possibility (c) in the case of QED and {{math|''φ''<sup>4</sup>}} theory. They have noted that the growth of {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub>}} in {{EquationNote|1|Eq.&nbsp;1}} drives the observable charge {{math|''g''<sub>obs</sub>}} to the constant limit, which does not depend on {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub>}}. The same behavior can be obtained from the functional integrals, omitting the quadratic terms in the action. If neglecting the quadratic terms is valid already for {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub> ≪ 1}}, it is all the more valid for {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub>}} of the order or greater than unity: it gives a reason to consider {{EquationNote|1|Eq.&nbsp;1}} to be valid for arbitrary {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub>}}. Validity of these considerations at the quantitative level is excluded by the non-quadratic form of the {{mvar|β}}-function.{{citation needed|date=November 2018}}

Nevertheless, they can be correct qualitatively. Indeed, the result {{math|''g''<sub>obs</sub> {{=}} const(''g''<sub>0</sub>)}} can be obtained from the functional integrals only for {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub> ≫ 1}}, while its validity for {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub> ≪ 1}}, based on {{EquationNote|1|Eq.&nbsp;1}}, may be related to other reasons; for {{math|''g''<sub>0</sub> ≈ 1}} this result is probably violated but coincidence of two constant values in the order of magnitude can be expected from the matching condition. The [[Monte Carlo method|Monte Carlo]] results <ref>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90246-3 | title = Monte Carlo renormalization group study of {{math|''φ''<sup>4</sup>}} field theory| journal = Nuclear Physics B| volume = 240| issue = 4| pages = 577| year = 1984| last1 = Callaway | first1 = D. J. E. | last2 = Petronzio | first2 = R. |bibcode = 1984NuPhB.240..577C | url = https://cds.cern.ch/record/150964}}</ref> seems to confirm the qualitative validity of the Landau–Pomeranchuk arguments, although a different interpretation is also possible.

The case (c) in the Bogoliubov and Shirkov classification corresponds to the [[quantum triviality]] in full theory (beyond its perturbation context), as can be seen by a [[reductio ad absurdum]]. Indeed, if {{math|''g''<sub>obs</sub> < ∞}}, the theory is internally inconsistent. The only way to avoid it, is for {{math|''μ''<sub>0</sub> → ∞}}, which is possible only for {{math|''g''<sub>obs</sub> → 0}}. It is a widespread belief {{by whom|date=November 2018}} that both QED and {{math|''φ''<sup>4</sup>}} theory are trivial in the [[continuum limit]].

== Phenomenological aspects ==
In a theory intended to represent a physical interaction where the coupling constant is known to be non-zero, Landau poles or triviality may be viewed as a ''sign of incompleteness in the theory''. For example, QED is usually not believed{{cn|date=June 2024}} to be a complete theory on its own, because it does not describe other [[fundamental interaction]]s, and contains a Landau pole. Conventionally QED forms part of the more fundamental [[electroweak theory]]. The {{math|U(1)<sub>Y</sub>}} group of electroweak theory also has a Landau pole which is usually considered{{by whom|date=June 2019}} to be a signal of a need for an ultimate embedding into a [[Grand Unified Theory]]. The grand unified scale would provide a natural cutoff well below the Landau scale, preventing the pole from having observable physical consequences.

The problem of the Landau pole in QED is of purely academic interest, for the following reason. The role of {{math|''g''<sub>obs</sub>}} in {{EquationNote|1|Eqs.&nbsp;1}},&nbsp;{{EquationNote|2}} is played by the [[fine structure constant]] {{math|''α'' ≈ 1/137}} and the Landau scale for QED is estimated as {{val|e=286|u=eV}}, which is far beyond any energy scale relevant to observable physics. For comparison, the maximum energies accessible at the [[Large Hadron Collider]] are of order {{val|e=13|u=eV}}, while the [[Planck scale]], at which [[quantum gravity]] becomes important and the relevance of [[quantum field theory]] itself may be questioned, is {{val|e=28|u=eV}}. The energy of the observable universe is on the order of  {{val|e=88|u=eV}}.

The [[Higgs boson]] in the [[Standard Model]] of [[particle physics]] is described by {{math|''φ''<sup>4</sup>}} theory (see ''[[Quartic interaction]]''). If the latter has a Landau pole, then this fact is used in setting a "triviality bound" on the Higgs mass. The bound depends on the scale at which new physics is assumed to enter and the maximum value of the quartic coupling permitted (its physical value is unknown). For large couplings, non-perturbative methods are required. This can even lead to a predictable Higgs mass in [[Physics applications of asymptotically safe gravity#Mass_of_the_Higgs_boson|asymptotic safety]] scenarios. Lattice calculations have also been useful in this context.<ref>For example, {{Cite journal|last1=Callaway|first1=D.J.E.|last2=Petronzio|first2=R.|doi=10.1016/0550-3213(87)90657-2|title=Is the standard model Higgs mass predictable?|journal=[[Nuclear Physics B]]|volume=292|pages=497–526|year=1987|bibcode=1987NuPhB.292..497C|url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/172532}}{{cite journal| last=Heller| first=Urs| author2=Markus Klomfass |author3=Herbert Neuberger |author4=Pavols Vranas | s2cid=7146602|date=1993-09-20|journal=[[Nuclear Physics B]]| volume=405| doi=10.1016/0550-3213(93)90559-8| pages=555–573|arxiv = hep-ph/9303215 |bibcode = 1993NuPhB.405..555H|title=Numerical analysis of the Higgs mass triviality bound|issue=2–3 }}, which suggests {{math|''M<sub>H</sub>'' < 710 GeV}}.</ref>

== Connections with statistical physics ==
A deeper understanding of the physical meaning and generalization of the
renormalization process leading to Landau poles comes from condensed matter physics. [[Leo P. Kadanoff]]'s paper in 1966 proposed the "block-spin" renormalization group.<ref>[[Leo Kadanoff|L.P. Kadanoff]] (1966): "Scaling laws for Ising models near {{math|''T''<sub>c</sub>}}", Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) '''2''', 263.</ref> The ''blocking idea'' is a way to define the components of the theory at large distances as aggregates of components at shorter distances. This approach was developed by [[Kenneth G. Wilson|Kenneth Wilson]].<ref>[[Kenneth G. Wilson|K.G. Wilson]](1975): The renormalization group: critical phenomena and the Kondo problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. '''47''', 4, 773.</ref> He was awarded the Nobel prize for these decisive contributions in 1982.

Assume that we have a theory described by a certain function {{math|''Z''}} of the state variables {{math|{{mset|''s''<sub>''i''</sub>}}}} and a set of coupling constants {{math|{{mset|''J''<sub>''k''</sub>}}}}. This function can be a [[partition function (quantum field theory)|partition function]], an [[Action (physics)|action]], or a [[Hamiltonian (quantum mechanics)|Hamiltonian]].
Consider a certain blocking transformation of the state variables {{math|{{mset|''s''<sub>''i''</sub>}} → {{mset|1={{overset|lh=0.5em|~|''s''<sub>''i''</sub>}}}}}}, the number of {{math|1={{overset|lh=0.5em|~|''s''<sub>''i''</sub>}}}} must be lower than the number of {{math|''s''<sub>''i''</sub>}}. Now let us try to rewrite {{math|''Z''}} ''only'' in terms of the {{math|1={{overset|lh=0.5em|~|''s''<sub>''i''</sub>}}}}. If this is achievable by a certain change in the parameters, {{math|{{mset|''J''<sub>''k''</sub>}} → {{mset|{{overset|lh=0.7em|~|''J''<sub>''k''</sub>}}}}}}, then the theory is said to be '''renormalizable'''. The most important information in the RG flow are its '''fixed points'''. The possible macroscopic states of the system, at a large scale, are given by this set of fixed points. If these fixed points correspond to a free field theory, the theory is said to exhibit [[quantum triviality]], and possesses a Landau pole. Numerous fixed points appear in the study of [[Lattice gauge theory#Quantum triviality|lattice Higgs theories]], but it is not known whether these correspond to free field theories.<ref name="TrivPurs"/>

== Large order perturbative calculations ==
Solution of the Landau pole problem requires the calculation of the Gell-Mann–Low function {{math|''β''(''g'')}} at arbitrary {{mvar|g}} and, in particular, its asymptotic behavior for {{math|''g'' → ∞}}. Diagrammatic calculations allow one to obtain only a few expansion coefficients {{math|''β''<sub>2</sub>, ''β''<sub>3</sub>, ...}}, which do not allow one to investigate the {{mvar|β}} function in the whole. Progress became possible after the development of the [[Lev Lipatov|Lipatov]] method for calculating large orders of perturbation theory:<ref>L.N.Lipatov, Zh.Eksp.Teor.Fiz. 72, 411 (1977) [Sov.Phys. JETP 45, 216 (1977)].</ref> One may now try to interpolate the known coefficients {{math|''β''<sub>2</sub>, ''β''<sub>3</sub>, ...}} with their large order behavior, and to then sum the perturbation series.

The first attempts of reconstruction of the {{math|''β''}} function by this method bear on the triviality of the {{math|''φ''<sup>4</sup>}} theory. Application of more advanced summation methods yielded the exponent {{mvar|α}} in the asymptotic behavior {{math|''β''(''g'') ∝ ''g<sup>α</sup>''}}, a value close to unity. The hypothesis for the asymptotic behavior of {{math|''β''(''g'') ∝ ''g''}} was recently presented analytically for {{math|''φ''<sup>4</sup>}} theory and QED.<ref>{{Cite journal |arxiv = 1010.4081|doi = 10.1134/S1063776108090094|title = Renormalization group functions of the {{math|''φ''<sup>4</sup>}} theory in the strong coupling limit: Analytical results|year = 2008|last1 = Suslov|first1 = I. M.|s2cid = 119205490|journal = Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics|volume = 107|issue = 3|pages = 413–429|bibcode = 2008JETP..107..413S}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |arxiv = 1010.4317|doi = 10.1134/S1063776110090153|title = Asymptotic behavior of the {{math|''β''}} function in the {{math|''ϕ''<sup>4</sup>}} theory: A scheme without complex parameters|year = 2010|last1 = Suslov|first1 = I. M.|s2cid = 118545858|journal = Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics|volume = 111|issue = 3|pages = 450–465|bibcode = 2010JETP..111..450S}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |arxiv = 0804.2650|doi = 10.1134/S1063776109060089|title = Exact asymptotic form for the {{math|''β''}} function in quantum electrodynamics|year = 2009|last1 = Suslov|first1 = I. M.|s2cid = 7219671|journal = Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics|volume = 108|issue = 6|pages = 980–984|bibcode = 2009JETP..108..980S}}</ref> Together with positiveness of {{math|''β''(''g'')}}, obtained by summation of the series, it suggests case (b) of the above Bogoliubov and Shirkov classification, and hence the absence of the Landau pole in these theories, assuming perturbation theory is valid (but see above discussion in the introduction ).

== See also ==
* [[Pole mass]]
* [[Quantum triviality]]

== References ==
{{reflist}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Landau Pole}}
[[Category:Quantum electrodynamics]]
[[Category:Renormalization group]]